I do not have children at RB and never had. I have heard positive things about Dave Monti. I have no interest in sniping at Dave Monti. He probably is a very good teacher. Why wouldn't he be?
My questions have to do with compensation. To what degree are school union reps compensated (salary, benefits, pension, time off) by the taxpayer? I would like to know, since the topic came up.
Eric Sundstrom:
1. Can we agree that it is widely accepted that taxpayers have a right to know the compensation level of public employees? Isn't that why the compensation is public information?
2. You asked, how my questions are germane to the interview Mr Monti gave? This interview is all about Mr. Monti's role as a union representative. All I want to know is to what degree the taxpayer is funding this position? To answer your question, I had to go and reread the interview - and it really is allowing Dave to provide the union point of view? Is this even appropriate without providing another view?
3. Eric, based on your postings here and certainly my comment applies to Mr. Spatney, you seem to try to be informed on the major issues of the day. The Tribune has been running a pretty hard hitting front page series - very hard hitting - about taxpayer funding of pensions - not based on government salaries - but on union salaries. So given that series - why wouldn't I want to know what the taxpayers are contributing to RB Union reps - above and beyond their teaching. Why is this such a surprising question - given the current topic in day to day news?
Here is a link to the Tribune series on pension abuse - you know the series that said the taxpayers are paying for a union official's pension - based on his union salary - after substitue teaching two days.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/watchdog/chi-pension-crisis-gallery,0,5880368.storygallery
The collusion of public employee unions and elected officials has simply convinced me that we are in serious trouble as a nation. People we elect to represent us and act in our interest are in fact stealing from us and laughing at our gullibility as we do it.
Please tell me you have read this series and tell me why you think I am wrong.
By the way, the Clarion interview is a union propoganda piece from start to finish. I read something recently, from a non Catholic, who sent their children to a Catholic school, that having their child learn religous values from a Catholic point of view was less alarming than the liberal point of view of public employees presented in a public school. After reading this interview, I know what they meant.
Posted Wednesday Nov 9, 2011 22:31
#