Some of us are a net profit to the budget; I overpay, for services I have never used: public schools and the "Recreation Department" being but two examples. I am one of those check signers. I am happy to pay more. But not for LARD like getting a pay raise for attaining, say, high-school level German disguised in a 'degree'.
Yes, we heard the backseat rhetoric during the TIF-tiff. We heard it from other backseat apple-polishers, smart ones. Fortunately, elected officials are still held to account by taxpaying voters in this country, if not in the Germany of yore.
If the quality of this argument for lard corresponds to the quality of certain services we receive, I am left in no doubt that we can do without some of this and that. This law of unintended consequences visited itself on another ambassador for his cause, the TIF, with extreme force.
As did the editor of the Landmark with regard to highly paid positions, I urge the trustees to start naming nonunion benefits, salaries, and positions, which can be cut before services are cut or a request for home rule or a tax raise is made. This must also be done before tax-diverting schemes are entertained which also entail the threat of eminent domain. These are the executive decisions that they were elected to make. The village admininistration itself has said at the LTFSC meeting that our departments have not all achieved excellent ratings of efficiency when compared to those of other towns. Let's get that done first. Then the taxpayers will be willing to part with more money.
In sum: all killer, no filler please.
Posted Wednesday Nov 7, 2007 20:40
#