Riverside Info » About Riverside

Homeowner Stares Down Wreckers, at Least for a While

(11 posts)
  • Started 5 years ago by MikeTomecek
  • Latest reply from spatny
  1. MikeT
    Member

    from the front page of today's NY Times (03/27/2007). You have got to see the picture of this guy in a middle of a development in China. Pls tell me if you cannot see the picture. I never know if the only reason I can see something like this is because I have the rights to see it.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/27/world/asia/27china.html?ex=1332734400&en=6fa6ba29dc716c3b&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

    Chongqing Journal
    Homeowner Stares Down Wreckers, at Least for a While
    China Photos/Getty Images
    A building sits on its own island of land in Chongqing Municipality, China. The homeowner has refused to sell to a developer, who went ahead with construction around the site.

    E-MailPrint Reprints Save Share
    DiggFacebookNewsvinePermalink

    By HOWARD W. FRENCH
    Published: March 27, 2007
    CHONGQING, China, March 23 —” For weeks the confrontation drew attention from people all across China, as a simple homeowner stared down the forces of large-scale redevelopment that are sweeping this country, blocking the preparation of a gigantic construction site by an act of sheer will.

    Skip to next paragraph

    Ariana Lindquist for The New York Times
    Wu Ping, and her brother Wu Jian last Wednesday in front of a construction site gate that barred Ms. Wu from her house.

    The New York Times
    At a site in Chongqing, all of the households but one have left.
    Chinese bloggers were the first to spread the news, of a house perched atop a tall, thimble-shaped piece of land like Mont-Saint-Michel in northern France, in the middle of a vast excavation.

    Newspapers dived in next, followed by national television. Then, in a way that is common in China whenever an event begins to take on hints of political overtones, the story virtually disappeared from the news media after the government, bloggers here said, decreed that the subject was suddenly out of bounds.

    Still, the “nail house,— as many here have called it because of the homeowner's tenacity, like a nail that cannot be pulled out, remains the most popular current topic among bloggers in China.

    It has a universal resonance in a country where rich developers are seen to be in cahoots with politicians and where both enjoy unchallenged sway. Each year, China is roiled by tens of thousands of riots and demonstrations, and few issues pack as much emotional force as the discontent of people who are suddenly uprooted, told that they must make way for a new skyscraper or golf course or industrial zone.

    What drove interest in the Chongqing case was the uncanny ability of the homeowner to hold out for so long. Stories are legion in Chinese cities of the arrest or even beating of people who protest too vigorously against their eviction and relocation. In one often-heard twist, holdouts are summoned to the local police station and return home only to find their house already demolished. How did this owner, a woman no less, manage? Millions wondered.

    Part of the answer, which on meeting her takes only a moment to discover, is that Wu Ping is anything but an ordinary woman. With her dramatic lock of hair precisely combed and pinned in the back, a form-flattering bright red coat, high cheekbones and wide, excited eyes, the tall, 49-year-old restaurant entrepreneur knows how to attract attention —” a potent weapon in China's new media age, in which people try to use public opinion and appeals to the national image to influence the authorities.

    “For over two years they haven't allowed me access to my property,— said Ms. Wu, her arms flailing as she led a brisk walk through the Yangjiaping neighborhood here. It is an area in the throes of large-scale redevelopment, with broad avenues, big shopping malls and a recently built elevated monorail line, from whose platform nearly everyone stops to gawk at the nail house.

    Within moments of her arrival at the locked gate of the excavated construction site, a crowd began to gather. The people, many of them workers with sunken cheeks, dressed in grimy clothes, regarded Ms. Wu with expressions of wonderment. Some of them exchanged stories about how they had been forced to relocate and soothed each other with comments about how it all could not be helped.

    From inside the gates a government television crew began filming.

    “If it were an ordinary person they would have hired thugs and beat her up,— murmured a woman dressed in a green sweater who was drawn by the throng. “Ordinary people don't dare fight with the developers. They're too strong.—

    Earlier this month the National People's Congress passed a historic law guaranteeing private property rights to China's swelling ranks of urban middle-class homeowners, among others. Some here attributed Ms. Wu's success to that, as well as her knack for generating publicity.

    “In the past they would have just knocked it down,— said an 80-year-old woman who said she used to be a neighbor of Ms. Wu's. “Now that's forbidden, because Beijing has put out the word that these things should be done in a reasonable way.—

    Between frenzied telephone calls to reporters and city officials, Ms. Wu, who stood at the center of the crowd with her brother, a 6-foot-3 decorative stone dealer who wore his brown hair in jheri curls, stated her case with a slightly different spin.

    “I have more faith than others,— she began. “I believe that this is my legal property, and if I cannot protect my own rights, it makes a mockery of the property law just passed. In a democratic and lawful society a person has the legal right to manage one's own property.—

    Tian Yihang, a local college student, spoke glowingly of her in an interview at the monorail station. “This is a peculiar situation,— he said, with a bit of understatement. “I admire the owner for being so persistent in her principles. In China such things shock the common mind.—

    Ms. Wu will in all likelihood lose her battle. Indeed, developers recently filed administrative motions to allow them to demolish her lonely building. Certainly the local authorities are eager to see the last of her.

    “During the process of demolition, 280 households were all satisfied with their compensation and moved,— said Ren Zhongping, a city housing official. “Wu was the only one we had to dismantle forcibly. She has the value of her house in her heart, but what she has in mind is not practical. It's far beyond the standards of compensation decided by owners of housing and the professional appraisal organ.—

    With the street so choked with onlookers that traffic began to back up, Ms. Wu's brother, Wu Jian, began waving a newspaper above the crowd, pointing to pictures of Ms. Wu's husband, a local martial arts champion, who was scheduled to appear in a highly publicized tournament that evening. “He's going into our building and will plant a flag there,— Mr. Wu announced.

    Moments later, as the crowd began to thin, a Chinese flag appeared on the roof with a hand-painted banner that read: “A citizen's legal property is not to be encroached on.—

    Asked how his brother-in-law had managed to get inside the locked site and climb the escarpment on which the house is perched, he said with a wink, “Magic.—

    Posted Tuesday Mar 27, 2007 11:23 #
  2. Catherine
    Member

    Reminds me of the guy who stood in front of the tank at Tiananmen. I'm surprised she didn't end up as an organ donor.

    I was just in Hinsdale yesterday. Saw another house being bullozed. Boy, that town gets uglier every time I go there. Beware.

    Posted Tuesday Mar 27, 2007 12:40 #
  3. ChrisHajer
    Member

    nail house

    The development continued all around the house, until Tuesday April 2nd when they left the house, and it was quickly demolished.

    demolition

    Posted Tuesday Apr 3, 2007 14:29 #
  4. MikeT
    Member

    Don't leave home without it.+

    .
    .
    .

    +you're home.

    .
    .

    that man Wu was my hero. Now cracks a plaster heart.

    Posted Tuesday Apr 3, 2007 16:22 #
  5. MikeT
    Member

    ...to drop the other wrecking ball, I mean shoe...

    .

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0704030578apr04,1,3256260,print.story

    WORLD

    China 'nail house' yields to mall, the inevitable
    Advertisement

    By Edward Cody
    The Washington Post

    April 4, 2007

    BEIJING -- For weeks, the little house sitting stubbornly atop an earthen pillar and surrounded by a busy construction site was a symbol of individual rights in the face of China's breakneck and often heedless economic development.

    Reporters from across China and beyond traveled to Chongqing, a sprawling city 850 miles southwest of Beijing, to document the campaign by Wu Ping and her husband, Yang Wu, to get more compensation for the small building where they had lived and run a restaurant for years. As they repeated tirelessly into the microphones, they were the lone holdouts among 280 houses bulldozed since 2004 to make way for a shopping center, and they vowed not to move out of the way until they got what they wanted.

    On Tuesday, news spread that the long struggle was finally over. Wu Ping and Yang Wu quietly reached an agreement with the development company Monday, local authorities reported. Bulldozers moved in during the night to raze the house, flatten the little pillar it stood on and pursue construction of yet another shopping center for China's increasingly well off 1.3 billion people.

    Wu Ping and Yang Wu, who had courted media attention for weeks to dramatize their plight, dropped out of sight after signing the deal. But despite their silence -- or perhaps because of it -- they and their house remain symbols for many Chinese.

    In comments by thousands of Internet users, they were cited as examples of how government and big business often crush individual Chinese, or of what people can achieve, even in this authoritarian country, if they stick to their guns and work the media well.

    The nationwide attention given to the Chongqing drama over the past few weeks, and to its outcome Tuesday, hinted at the frustration felt by many Chinese at the lack of legal protection for citizens in a country where business and government are marching hand in hand toward economic growth. The house was gleefully labeled a "nail house," borrowing from a popular Chinese expression in which a "nail" is a person who sticks out by refusing to submit to authority.

    In the broad coverage and comments, Chinese seemed to cheer on the couple precisely for this reason, urging them to hold firm against the combined weight of local authorities and big business. When it became known Tuesday, the solution was also generally hailed as a wise compromise and a victory for the couple.

    "It's a multiple-win outcome," concluded Beijing's Xin Jing Bao newspaper.

    The couple came out ahead, the newspaper said, because they got a ground-floor apartment with space to open a new restaurant to continue earning a livelihood. The developer came out ahead, the editorialist added, because his company can go ahead with the shopping center. And the local government came out ahead, he reasoned, because a long, embarrassing dispute was settled to the apparent satisfaction of both parties.

    Some Internet commentators agreed. "We appreciate what the nail couple did. They set a good example for common citizens," one writer said on the popular sohu.com site. "They protected citizens' dignity by sticking with their little house."

    Another credited Wu and Yang with generating enough public interest in their case through the media to force Chongqing authorities and the development company to back down. "Officials and developers lowered their heads, subject to the public pressures."

    But other commentators were not convinced. "A farce," said one. "Was Wu Ping threatened?" asked Zhou Shuguang, who had been following the struggle on his blog. "Or were we used by Wu Ping?"

    The doubts stemmed partly from the couple's silence. After weeks of broadcasting their demands, they did not publicly describe the terms of their agreement or detail what finally persuaded them to leave.

    The Jiu Longpo District Court, which had given the couple until April 10 to leave or face forcible eviction, announced that Wu and Yang would get a new apartment and business space in another neighborhood in addition to about $120,000 in compensation for loss of business during the standoff. That was markedly higher than what the developer initially offered.

    Posted Thursday Apr 5, 2007 13:48 #
  6. spatny
    Member

    I think we should change the name of the Village Board to reflect the mandate they believe they have becauase they have garnered so many votes in their uncontested elections. Claiming that the people have already made the choice on the TIF when they elected these Trustees to the Board, and that this upcoming referendum "is meaningless" reminds me of the way Elena Ceausescsu got her honorary doctorates in everything from the Rumanian schools. By default. We should have a "Name that Board" contest. Who wants to go first?

    Posted Thursday Apr 5, 2007 18:26 #
  7. Catherine
    Member

    Politburo. Supreme Committee. Guardians of the Happiness of the People. Committee for the Reconstruction and Revitalization of the Peoples Republic of Riverside.

    Something like that.

    Posted Thursday Apr 5, 2007 18:58 #
  8. Tim
    Member

    I don't think any names are necessary.

    Our Trustees are who they are.

    They will be remembered for the decisions they have made and will make.

    When my partners at work asked me about the picture in the Tribune article on the Riverside TIF a few weeks back, the one with the massive construction project in the background, I had to tell them that this is our downtown. They were appalled. I was embarrassed.

    Riverside was my sanctuary. Now it is a joke. I'm really glad our Trustees think this is so funny.

    Maybe they should try to cross the street at Burlington and Longcommon with children during daylight hours. I'm sure their vision of Olmsted includes drivers angrily staring down our Village crossing guards every morning as children try to cross the street to get to school...

    ...oh wait, it's easy to be fearless with a hard-hat on.

    Posted Thursday Apr 5, 2007 20:00 #
  9. spatny
    Member

    That's the ticket. We could have one meeting a year where they all come in costime. The Major General (Reserve) probably has one of those chrome Patton helmets he could wear, and the Village Manager-ess could have a tiara and fairy-godmother wand. We could all dress as supplicants and tug our forelocks and ask for blessings- which leaves me out because I don't have a forelock anymore. Maybe we could syndicate this as a TV show and save the village that way. But without a forelock my career is finito! Oh, woe is me...

    Posted Thursday Apr 5, 2007 23:17 #
  10. TODD
    Member

    null

    Posted Friday Apr 6, 2007 06:30 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.