Riverside Info » About Riverside

"It's the music, stupid !"

(3 posts)
  1. MikeT
    Member

    Babies Know Happy From Sad Songs

    I saw the following article today,and it reminded me of the dynamics going on in our nat'l and local elections - and which has been alluded to in this space - we hear the music and not the words; visceral reactions seem to be how we come to 'judge'.

    At base it seems to me that we never quite lose our babyhood, and we really perceive and process the world *almost* like a baby, despite our large frames and brains.

    For example, Obama (actually mixed race) as a 'black man' - he's got my vote; he doesn't have my vote. Obama projected on two 40 foot jumbo trons+. Mccain as an 'old man', 'erratic', mccain as the tortured patriot, the 'only one who really has fought for his country'. Locally, 'we have NO money in the till - we are going to cut fire protection and the rec dept'.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20081009/sc_livescience/babiesknowhappyfromsadsongs

    Babies Know Happy From Sad Songs

    LiveScience.com 53 minutes ago

    Babies as young as 5 months can distinguish an upbeat tune, such as "Ode to Joy" from Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, from a lineup of gloomy tunes.

    Researchers displayed an emotionally-neutral face for the baby while sad music played. When the baby looked away from the face, the music stopped and a new sad song would start. When the happier "Ode to Joy" played, the babies stared at the face three to four seconds longer, suggesting they were interested in the shift.

    By 9 months old, babies can do the opposite, picking out the sorrowful sound of Beethoven's Seventh Symphony from a pack of happy pieces.

    The finding is another example of how babies make sense of the world long before they can talk, said Brigham Young University psychology professor and study author Ross Flom.

    "One of the first things babies understand communicatively is emotion, so for them the melody is the message," Flom said. "Our study showed that by nine months, babies are categorizing songs as happy or sad the same way that preschoolers and adults do."

    The results of the musical study will be published in the upcoming issue of the journal Infant Behavior and Development.

    So what makes a happy song?

    BYU music professor Susan Kenney, who was not involved with the study, noted some of the technical differences between the happy and sad songs the babies heard.

    "The happy songs were all in major keys with fairly short phrases or motives that repeated," Kenney said. "The tempo and melodic rhythms were faster than any of the sad selections, and the melodies had a general upward direction. Four of the sad songs were in minor keys and all had a slower beat and long melodic rhythms. For an infant to notice those differences is fascinating.

    .
    .

    +
    Those jumbo trons were an eery reminder of that great Mac commercial done by ridley scott - which commercial is also a testament to what I am speaking about here...

    Posted Thursday Oct 9, 2008 11:35 #
  2. idic5
    Member

    I heard an interesting show today on Fresh Air 915 fm radio, about a neurologist's view of how humans make decisions. It turns out emotional factors make up a larger portion of the process than what we call the 'purely rational' in the pre-frontal cortex.

    I was about to say something that is a consequence of the pre-eminence of emotion in the decision making process relative to our local Village Board election, but reason - or was it fear of what I might say or who I might alienate?- got the better hold of me and I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions.

    NOTE - this thread was created before the national election for president. After the election, the standard bearer of the incumbent Republican party, Mccain, ended up with a very high 48 pct of the popular vote. This is a heckuva lot of votes for an incumbent party whose leader, Bush, had the lowest approval rating ever (or very very low), and who presided during his two terms over the greatest economic meltdown since the Great Depression.

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101334645

    His book is How we Decide

    http://kottke.org/08/11/how-we-decide

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/14/RV2R154OPO.DTL

    .

    ps - I saw that the yahoo newslink that prompted the post above expired. This supports doing a full copy-paste of the article unless you can get a permalink.

    Posted Sunday Mar 15, 2009 18:09 #
  3. Catherine
    Member

    Humans are rational and nonrational. The latter is not to be confused with the negative connotations of the "irrational." One could be pre-eminently rational and insane, such as the cases of a socipath or psychopath.

    We bring the whole package with us, whatever we do. That is human.

    I'm not sure I agree the predominant reaction to the local election is emotional, although there is plenty of that. And it is true that when one party actually fails to make assertions, like whether they will raise taxes, cut the budget, neither or both, there is a shortage of facts upon which to practice ratiocination.

    Posted Monday Mar 16, 2009 10:33 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.