Riverside Info » About Riverside

Olmsted's Notes on Tree Grouping in Riverside

(6 posts)
  • Started 3 years ago by TomJacobs
  • Latest reply from TomJacobs

Tags:

  1. TomJacobs
    Member

    From "The Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted, Volume VI, The Johns Hopkins University Press (available in the Olmsted Society collection at the Riverside Public Library

    Notes on Tree Grouping at Riverside

    c. 1868

    In planting the long common and adjoining borders, oaks and elms should frequently stand alone or a little detached from groups, more frequently alone than anywhere else on the place except perhaps Indian Garden where elms will be likely to grow particularly well and should accordingly be exhibited somewhat distinctively. In groups where oaks are intended to predominate, elms, especially the stiffer European sorts may be introduced. Chestnuts also associate very agreeably with nearly all oaks – better than with elms, so do the maples generally, and the maples better with chestnuts than with elms. The American Lime vary agreeably with either of the above. Dogwood and Alder and I should think the common Craetagus of Riverside would go well with oak and with all of the above. The English field Maple, A. Campestris is also harmonious with the oak in masses.

    In groups in which the American elm predominates after other elms, maples may be subordinate with advantage. The Nettle tree and the Hornbeams are good for tailing down a group of elms being of lower growth and somewhat like form with but little variety of color. Ashes may also be planted with elm.

    Ash with Black Walnut
    Groups wholly of Ashes
    Groups wholly of Beeches are very agreeable and alternate agreeably
    Horn beam with Beech
    Birches with Beech
    Horn Beam with Birches

    Consequently these three; though the little white birch is hardly suitable when you are studying broad effects with these.

    American Lime may predominate in many groups. The Horse Chestnut associates more quietly with the Limes than with any other tree I think. I hardly know why and it may be more associative with other pleasant circumstances in my mind. I can put nothing else of much size agreeably with Massachusetts Maples – oaks – elms come in subordinately to bodies of Limes very pleasantly.

    There are many varieties of the Limes: the silver leafed and the pendulous are very valuable on the ends of groups, or the lighter colored varieties in coves of the darker and vice versa. Do not feel wholly confident of the hardiness of the “fancy” varieties as they are all seedlings of the European.

    The Mulberries may be planted with the Limes very freely I think.

    I feel great confidence in the Larch upon the prairies and should therefore let it predominate in some groups – chiefly on the side issues of the Common – the Delaplaine road for example. Half a dozen larches might be associated with two or three Hemlocks, and as many Birches and Hornbeams. The little white Birch will be here appropriate, especially if you desire to tail down at the ends, the weeping larch and the weeping and cut-leaved birch will give elegance to the ends of such a group, or will appear to advantage standing alone nearby. Alder will come in also very well as a quite subordinate member and will serve to connect groups of Birch, Larch, etc., with adjoining groups of oaks, etc., with which it would (but they would not directly) harmonize.

    The original is a typescript in the Olmsted Papers. Apparently prepared by Theodora Kimball, it bears the penciled notation “From manuscript notes of F.L.O.”

    Posted Tuesday Sep 15, 2009 22:27 #
  2. JohnM
    Member

    Tom,

    This is interesting. I'm not sure if it is evidence that there was an "offical" Olmsted plan for certain trees (and, in fairness, I don't know if that's the reason you posted it). Rather, it seems to me that the trees planted were those readily available and native to the area (I'm sure price was a consideration as well-- the Riverside Improvement Corp. went bankrupt before the full development of Riverside was completed, so I presume money was always an issue.)

    Of the trees identified above, the black walnut, maple, oak, birch, hornbeam, dogwood and common Cragetus (hawthorn) are on the LAC list. I think--although I'm not certain, that the "American Lime" referenced above is the same as the American Linden--if so, that's also allowed. However, there is no mention of chestnut, larch, alder, or hemlock. In addition, the white mulberry and white and blue ash are on the LAC of proscribed trees (the ash due to EAB). American elms, of course, cannot be plkanted due to DED. (I do leave open the possibility that some of the trees are on the list under different names).

    The point, though, is that things have changed since FLO's day. Certain trees are no longer viable--either due to cost or to their susceptibility to disease and pests. Basing a planting policy on a strict interpretation--by a few people--of Olmsted's intentions does not benefit the Village, and only serves to ensure that we continue to lose more trees than we put in.

    Posted Wednesday Sep 16, 2009 08:56 #
  3. mrt
    Member

    thanks, tom, for copying those notes in this space. It adds another thread of info on Riverside plantings, a subject that has been exercised in this forum. How cool, thanks to Kim and Chris, to be able to click on riversideinfo.org and get some insights from Fredick law olmsted circa 1868 to help round out a good discussion on plantings in riverside.

    Yes, John, I don't agree with everything that was said in those notes either: mulberry tree! I was happy to see mine go - but the racoons might not have been as happy.

    Posted Wednesday Sep 16, 2009 13:09 #
  4. PAR4
    Member

    'In groups where oaks are intended to predominate, elms, especially the stiffer European sorts may be introduced.'

    Hmmmm....I was under the impression (based on the FLO representation on the LAC) that the American species of elm was the only variety allowed in our historic town.

    Posted Thursday Sep 17, 2009 13:00 #
  5. Tim
    Member

    So, as Tom's post highlights, it is sometimes a good idea to read the fine print.

    Of note, some of the DED-resistant elms (at least the Princeton and Jefferson) are American Elm varieties. I have yet to come across a European DED-resistant cultivar, but maybe curiousresident has.

    After riding my bike through a canopy of Elms on East Avenue in Oak Park on my way to work this am I couldn't help but think we must find a way to keep this tree alive in the Riverside landscape.

    Posted Thursday Sep 17, 2009 13:28 #
  6. Michael Foley
    Member

    I think Olmsted would say plant what ever won't die but more importantly consider the planting location.

    Posted Thursday Sep 17, 2009 16:02 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.