Riverside Info » About Riverside

Open Letter to D96 Board of Education

(51 posts)
  1. TomJacobs
    Member

    Please e-mail your name and street address to district96taxpayer@yahoo.com if you would like to co-sign the letter, or assist in distributing the letter to members of the community. As of Wednesday 8/5 9pm, there are over 40 signatures already.

    OPEN LETTER
    to Riverside Public Schools District 96 Board of Education,
    and Dr. Jonathan Lamberson, District Superintendent
    Riverside, August 4, 2009

    In light of the recent contract negotiations with District 96 superintendent Dr. Lamberson, we, the undersigned, feel compelled to express our disapproval with the level of compensation granted to Dr. Lamberson, and the handling of this issue by the members of District 96 Board of Education. We have concerns as to the intent and ability of the current school board to fulfill its duties and obligations to the District’s taxpayers, which include providing leadership and administrative oversight. As a result, we urge the Board to adopt 6 recommendations and policies, and ask Dr. Lamberson to voluntarily renegotiate his salary and not take the proposed pay increases.

    Inadequate fiscal prudence
    We have reached the conclusion that the current Board is lacking perspective with regard to a reasonable and fair level of compensation for the District’s superintendent based on two specific facts: first, the overall level of the superintendent’s compensation, and second, the 20% pay raise for school year 2008-09, aimed at further inflating pension benefits paid for by all IL taxpayers.

    Over the terms of the superintendent’s two contracts, from school year 2005-06 to 2012-13, a 77% salary increase will have been granted to Dr. Lamberson. During school year 2012-13, Dr. Lamberson’s annual salary will be $313,000, not including other benefits.

    For the purpose of providing perspective, following are the annual salaries for various high level governmental management and leadership positions. The Governor of the State of Illinois is paid $166,000, the City of Chicago Mayor $216,000, and the U.S. Vice President $221,000.
    The CEO of the Chicago Public School System, which is the 3rd largest school district in the U.S., is paid $195,000. Chicago Public Schools are comprised of 666 schools, 407,955 students, and an operating budget of $4.855 billion. By comparison, Dr. Lamberson’s 2008-09 retroactively adjusted annual salary is $268,000. District 96 contains 5 schools and a total of 1,378 students, a vast majority of whom come from stable homes in a stable community, where parents prize and promote academic achievement.

    The most recent 2008-09 school year salary adjustment that amounts to a 20% pay raise is inconceivable. It appears to be a move to circumvent state regulations and associated penalties meant to discourage the arbitrary action of granting the 20% pay raise in the first place. This irresponsible and unfair action renders the Board complicit in the abuse of the statewide pension system for educators, and presents an embarrassment to a District with a mission, among others, to foster respect for self and community.

    Further, the board seems unwilling to acknowledge that events and forces outside the halls of the schools can and should have an impact on the spending habits of the district, and that the funds used to pay Dr. Lamberson's salary are coming from many people who are facing significant financial difficulties.

    Lack of perspective regarding fiscal health of district
    In their letter titled “Extending contract in best interest of District 96 community” published in the Riverside Brookfield Landmark on 8 July 2009, the Board asserts that the District’s great financial standing is due to Dr. Lamberson’s stewardship and expertise as the district’s business manager, while not acknowledging that the main reason for the District’s excellent fiscal health is the 2004 Property Tax referendum for District 96 which was approved by the taxpayers. As a result, District 96 has had a budget surplus totaling over $9million over the past 4 years of Dr. Lamberson’ tenure. However, expenses surged to just under $17 million in school year 2008-09 during his tenure, while they consistently ranged between $10.5 million and $11.5 million for the 5 years prior to Dr. Lamberson’s arrival at District 96. We conclude that D96 School Board members lack perspective regarding the key drivers responsible for the financial health of the district.

    Inadequate oversight
    The underlying message, in the limited communications by the Board with the community, alludes to the success of our schools and students primarily as the result of one man's efforts, much more so than a joint effort including our school principals, teachers, and parents. This apparent tendency to unevenly acknowledge credit is an issue of fairness, and is confirmed upon closer study of the levels of compensation across all levels of District staff. There is a significant discrepancy in the ratio of average administrator’s salaries over teachers’ salaries in District 96 as compared to the same ratio in the entire State. Over the past 10 years, based on information from the IL State Board of Education, the average administrator salary was $110,615 in the district, while the state average admin salary was $91,969, a 20% premium at D96 over the State. The teachers’ average salary of $52,446 in the district was actually smaller than the one in the State at $52,706.

    Averaged over the last 10 years, 57.8% of D96 teachers hold a master’s degree or above, as compared to 48.5% in the State, and the average individual teacher’s experience over the same period is 13.4 years in the district and 13.7 years in the state. Additionally, the pupil to administrator ratio has consistently been lower in the district and stands at 172:1 in 2008 as compared to 212:1 in the state.

    Recommendations
    In light of all of the above, we, the undersigned, urge the Board to adopt the following recommendations and policies in the spirit of our shared purpose and highest objective to continually improve District 96 schools:

    1. The Board shall improve communications with the community. It achieves this charge by proactively soliciting and balancing the participation and input of members of the community. It shall establish a forum for questions, discussion, and public input in addition to and outside of the monthly School Board meetings. In responding to the communities’ questions and concerns, the Board shall set the highest standard with regard to transparency and accountability, aimed to assure that every possible angle is covered as the basis for informed decision making.

    2. All written information and documentation discussed during regular Board meetings shall be made available to the general public at least 3 business days in advance of a Board meeting, similar to the pdf packets the Village of Riverside administration posts on their website for review and download. All written information and documentation pertaining to business items discussed during closed session meetings shall be distributed to all Board members 3 business days in advance of the closed session meeting.

    3. The Board shall fulfill its leadership role within the larger Riverside community, and acknowledge the role of education within the community’s broader purposes and other taxing bodies. It shall proactively engage in coordination and planning meetings and activities held among the major taxing bodies, and initiate them in case such efforts do not exist. The Board shall regularly provide status reports of this coordination effort to the community.

    4. The Board shall assume a leadership position in fighting prevalent abuses in the State of Illinois Administrators and Teachers Pension System. It shall do so on all jurisdictional levels, including local, state and federal. It shall reach out to all members of the community in soliciting the vast expertise among its residents, in an effort to jointly tackle and fight the prevalent abuse of a well intentioned system.

    5. The Board shall present to the community the systems of performance tracking and processes of accountability used to evaluate the District superintendent and its principals.

    6. The Board shall request that Dr. Lamberson follow the example of Elgin Area School District U-46 Jose Torres, who turned down his pay raise as reported in the Daily Herald on July 22, 2009.

    Sincerely,

    Thomas Jacobs, 104 Scottswood Road, Riverside

    Posted Wednesday Aug 5, 2009 21:40 #
  2. chrisrobling
    Member

    This is a great letter and a great step for all of us who think the Board needs to return to the reality we share, in which this contract is politically unsustainable.

    Based on my dealings with D96, I think nothing has been more important there than keeping parents from organizing to hold the Board accountable on something.

    Be it math curriculum, hardscape/landscape, the idiotic waste of money entailed in "laptops for every fifth-grader," or any of the many other issues, the D96 worldview is devoted to diffusing opposition and stifling debate. If we ever do get together, it shifts to ignoring us and proceeding as if we hadn't.

    Most of my time is spent with RB, which is plodding through its own issues. To give you an idea of how remote I believe D96 is, I have told Nancy Jenson that RB has demonstrated on several recent occasions considerably greater openness to substantive community input than the frigid shoulder we have received at the D96 doorstep for the last several years. RB -- in particular Larry Herbst -- deserves credit for that, and despite other differences I gladly acknowledge it.

    There are new Board members at District 96 who must be learning from this experience. That's great. Two of them arose from general disatisfaction with the Board, as evinced by the tone and direction of Network 96. One hopes they recognize that had Board leadership, present or past, had as much loyalty to them and their colleagues as it has demonstrated to the Superintendent, then they, their colleagues and this community would not be where we are, and the great letter above would never have been written. None of this, in fact, ever would have happened.

    Alas, D96 Board leadership -- present and past -- sees things quite differently. Thus we are stuck with this flat tire of a contract right at the start of a new board term and new school year. With all due respect, one hopes Board leadership finds its way back to the rest of us. Signing the above letter is a wonderful way to help it on that path.

    Posted Thursday Aug 6, 2009 11:53 #
  3. TS
    Member

    I've already signed. I don't understand how this board and the RB board can be so far out of touch with the tax paying public. We need these elected officials to be fiscally responsible. If they can't manage our tax money properly then they need to step aside. They need to start acting as representatives of the taxpayers. They are responsible to the public, not the superintendents, the administrators, the teachers, or the unions. It is not their responsibility to provide an enhanced retirement package to those who work in the schools. Stop spending my money irresponsibly!!!

    Posted Thursday Aug 6, 2009 14:46 #
  4. BethZ
    Member

    I believe that the lastest letter includes 91 signatures.

    Posted Friday Aug 7, 2009 02:27 #
  5. Catherine
    Member

    I would hope that Lamberson all by himself will prove too ashamed to accept such an absurd increase in compensation.

    Posted Friday Aug 7, 2009 10:12 #
  6. KimJ
    Member

    This is an email thread that has been circulating. There is very interesting info here.
    I removed all names & email addresses.
    It may make sense to start from the bottom up to follow the progression.

    Thank you everyone for your comments and isn't it wonderful to have this great dialog going on!!! I also couldn't agree more with M***'s comment that we have wonderful teachers and with F***'s comments that we have a very supportive community/families. I am grateful for both everyday.

    Just to clarify the salary issue, we found the following information and hope that it is helpful:

    When comparing salaries using www.championnews.net, it is difficult to know exactly what each individual superintendent's current salary is because the numbers are reported a year late. So the 2008 salary that is reported is really the 2007-2008 school year - which is the year before last in school-time. Also, in the case of Dr. Lamberson, his contract was amended. So when the 2009 salaries are reported, it will show that Dr. Lamberson earned $242,000 even though his salary was amended to $268,000. Other districts may have made similar amendments - so the salary numbers can be deceiving. That being said, the information is the only thing we have to compare.

    A comparison to other high-end districts and their salaries in 2008 (this is in response to K***'s comments, but is a skewed perspective because we are comparing ourselves to some of the wealthiest areas in the state, with Dr. Lamberson's numbers still being high even in this elite grouping) :

    1.) Winnetka - $281,464
    2.) Oak Park - $220,751
    3.) Sunset Ridge - $227,948
    4.) Barrington - $201,986
    5.) Riverside - $194,000
    6.) Northbrook SD60 - $192,000
    7.) Lake Forest - 190,316
    8.) Hinsdale - $187,638
    9.) Western Springs - $177,594
    10.) River Forest - $135,593

    Now if you take the salary and divide by the number of students that each superintendent is responsible for, a different picture emerges:

    1.) Sunset Ridge - $227,948/507 students = $449/student
    2.) Northbrook SD60 - $192,000/1095 students = $175/student
    3.) Riverside - $194,000/1349 students = $143/student
    4.) Winnetka - $281,464 /2087 students = $134/student
    5.) Western Springs - $177,594/1467 students = $121/student
    6.) River Forest - $135,593 /1349 students = $100/student
    7.) Lake Forest - 190,316/2285 students = $83/student
    8.) Oak Park - $220,751/5001 students = $44/student
    9.) Hinsdale - $187,638/4007 students = $46/student (and w/ Dr. Curley's salary of $385,000/4059 students = $94/student)
    10.) Barrington - $201,986/8955 students = $22/student

    We don't know the future salaries of other districts, but even if Riverside's enrollment hits 1500 by 2012-2013, the breakdown for Dr. Lamberson's salary would be $313,000/1500 students = $208/student.

    For that ratio to be equal among other high-end districts (about $200/student), then Barrington's superintendent would be making $1,800,000, Hinsdale's superintendent would be making $820,000.

    In response to K***'s comment that: "In '06 - '07, he didn't come close to some of those surrounding us (Hinsdale = $385,000, Oak Park = $217,000+, Winnetka = $374,000, Sunset Ridge, Northbrook = $342,184). I am only showing ELEMENTARY superintendent salaries. Dr. Lamberson was at $200,000 in that year! "

    Based on the 2008 reported salaries, the superintendents you cited from 2006-2007 were clearly close to retirement, because the most recent salaries are much lower. One of our messages is that we believe it is unfair to "bump up" salaries of educators right before retirement. The reason those salaries from 2006-2007 were so high is due to the practice of giving educators large raises at the end of their careers because the retirement pension is tied directly to their last years of working. That practice is one of the issues that we would like District 96 to fight against.

    We hope that you find this information helpful. We have approximately 100 signatures and more are coming in. Thank you everyone for your interest and support. O***

    Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 9:34 AM
    Subject: Re: District 96-Dr. Lamberson's salary and the upcoming school board meeting

    I agree our teachers are amazing. The excellent schools were a big factor in us moving here.

    Regarding teacher compensation, it is fair to say that they are fairly compensated, or better put, averagely compensated.

    When doing the research for the letter that prompted this email thread, it was discovered that over the past ten years, a D96 teacher is paid slightly less than the state average ($52,446 in the district, albeit practically identical, to the State average of $52,706.)
    However, our teachers possess 20% more masters degrees than the state average and have the same level of experience 13.4 years (vs. 13.7 for the state.)

    Conversely, over the same period of time, our administrators average salary was approx 20% higher than the state average, $110,615 in the district, while the state average admin. salary was $91,969. These numbers do not include the most recent pay increase that prompted this entire discussion.

    Also to note, in the school year 2007-08 the student to administrator ratio stands at 172:1 in D96 and 212:1 in the state.
    So the idea that there is a lean administrative staff does not make sense.

    If you have not read the original letter, please do so.
    If you have not signed the letter yet, please join the almost 100 names that came in over the last 24 hrs. and add your name & address to
    district96taxpayer@yahoo.com

    Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 8:13 AM
    Subject: Re: District 96-Dr. Lamberson's salary and the upcoming school board meeting

    Please do not forget the incredible teachers our district provides for our children....I believe they are compensated fairly but without the COMBINATION of parent support, teachers and resources provided around the community the District's academic standings may suffer.

    Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 12:11 AM

    Add 2 more cents:
    Winnetka, Hinsdale, Oak Park - all those districts have larger populations and therefore enrollment than Riverside with at least 7 elementary schools and 2 junior high schools in each of their districts.
    Although we can and should aspire to perform like those schools academically our tax base is quite different. They have thriving business districts contributing to their tax base. The average residential property in some of those communities also have greater market values than the average residential property in Riverside which probably supports the argument for the homeowner paying higher taxes. Under these circumstances you really can't compare how Riverside Schools are funded compared to the schools in these communities. Besides I don't think that it's been proven that there is a direct link between the amount of a superintendant's salary and increase in school performance.
    I remember a time when District 96 did not have such a surplus and surpluses don't last forever. The money will run out someday. The district can spend it all on one person or spread it around, being careful to make last as long as possible. This community very generously passed a referendum for the district a few years back and Dr. Lambersen and the school board should be very careful to not make us regret that decision.
    Our schools perform the way they do because of the support and involvement the schools get from the parents in this community. Now I'd be willing to bet that the loss of parent support in our schools would be reflected in our District's academic standings.

    On Thu, 8/6/09, K*** K*** wrote:

    Date: Thursday, August 6, 2009, 6:56 AM

    O***... thank you for your insight and comparisons. Such a great explanation to understanding todays fiscal responsibility we all have in this time of crisis with our economy.

    I just wanted to add my 2 cents if I may? I do hope people understand what the past agreement included when District 96 hired Dr. Lamberson. In addition, when comparing his salary to other "HIGH END ACADEMIC" schools (not CPS - who do not meet the marks needed according to State and National norms) his salary is lower than the highest paid superintendent.

    In '06 - '07, he didn't come close to some of those surrounding us (Hinsdale = $385,000, Oak Park = $217,000+, Winnetka = $374,000, Sunset Ridge, Northbrook = $342,184). I am only showing ELEMENTARY superintendent salaries. Dr. Lamberson was at $200,000 in that year!

    I have to wonder what their salaries will be in 2012, 2013... I personally pay high taxes so my Children go to GOOD/TOP schools and not CPS.

    Do I agree with an increase and the balance between his salary and other top officials - of coarse not!

    Would I like to see district 96 be more fiscally responsible at this time - ABSOLUTELY. We own our own company and have decreased our salaries to keep our employees - employed.

    I just wanted people to understand what his salary looks like TODAY compared to those top districts around us as well as the information you have given!

    Thanks for your hard work,
    K*** K****

    On Aug 6, 2009, at 4:58 AM, O*** wrote:

    Attached is an Open Letter in pdf format to School District 96 Board of Education regarding the recent salary negotiations with Dr. Lamberson. The following is the executive summary:
    We, the undersigned, feel compelled to express our disapproval with the level of compensation granted to Dr. Lamberson, which amounts to a 77% salary increase over 8 years, and the handling of this issue by the members of District 96 Board of Education. We have concerns as to the intent and ability of the current school board to fulfill its duties and obligations to the District’s taxpayers, which include providing leadership and administrative oversight. As a result, we urge the Board to adopt 6 recommendations and policies, and ask Dr. Lamberson to voluntarily renegotiate his salary and not take the proposed pay increases.

    Posted Friday Aug 7, 2009 10:49 #
  7. martjack
    Member

    I have only heard one side of the story; I'd like to hear from the School Board. I hope that people going to the School Board meeting will show some respect and dignity and not have a mob mentality. Some of us actually want to hear what the Board members have to say. Let's behave like we would want our children to behave in public!

    Posted Friday Aug 7, 2009 20:38 #
  8. Catherine
    Member

    Which part of $313K is unclear? I think it is time for the Board to sit and listen to the taxpayers. They have had quite enough one-way communication.

    Yes, I too hope we don't have the mob mentality of the kind of people who fall in lockstep with and defend whoever has the power, no matter how outrageous their behavior.

    Posted Saturday Aug 8, 2009 07:16 #
  9. riversider
    Member

    Wow, remember when this seemed like a lot of money?
    http://www.riversideinfo.org/forum/topic/raise-for-rb-assistant-principal

    Trying to find the letter to the editor of The Landmark signed by board president Nancy Jensen regardig the contract that was negotiated. Martjack, that was when we heard from the board, after the fact, in response to the outrage. I can't find it though.

    Oh wait, it's right here:
    http://www.rblandmark.com/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=5159&SectionID=3&SubSectionID=46&S=1

    http://www.riversideinfo.org/forum/topic/d-96-dollars-and-sense-1/page/2#post-9816

    Posted Saturday Aug 8, 2009 09:05 #
  10. TomJacobs
    Member

    martjack:

    You state above that "some of us actually want to hear what the Board members have to say."

    So do I.

    On July 8, 2009, I sent a letter to the Board with 10 specific questions regarding the salary increase. On July 10, I sent an e-mail to the Board in response to their "One View" piece in the Landmark in which they argue that keeping Dr. Lamberson is in the best interest of the School District.

    I am awaiting Board answers to my questions.

    I also believe that all of the already well above 100 people who have signed the letter so far would like to hear from the Board. That is the reason we decided to go the route of the Open Letter.

    This is a PUBLIC school district issue. Open communication is not negotiable.

    Posted Saturday Aug 8, 2009 21:07 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.