Riverside Info » About Riverside

Protect the Swan Pond and riverside parkland

(49 posts)
  1. spatny
    Member

    The Board and Village Manager continue to hold up the TOD study as "the plan" for Riverside's improvement and hence the need for the TIF. Am I the only one that believes that plan was nothing but a bunch of stock cliches that the "planners" roll out and peddle to all their Metra sponsored clients? I have repeatedly asked the Board - verbally and in writing, to define what the little building and parking lot is (for) that appears in that plan - I mean the one east and south of the Swinging Bridge on Riverside Road. No one will answer. I hear Board members laud the "riverwalk" concept as they seem to understand it, calling for continuing some kind of path or walkway behind the library to the Swinging Bridge and perhaps beyond, calling to pave it with brick or cement, widen it, put in "wayfinding signage" and even have a souvenir stand somewhere along it. Presumably all the people that come to the "boutique hotel" or riverside restaurant or conference center will get lost or get their shoes dirty if this doesn't happen. I hear about the need to "repair" the WPA steps and the "blight" presumably caused by the seasonal flooding that naturally occurs in the Swan Pond as reasons to include these areas in the TIF District. FYI Board members - flooding is much worse at Indian Gardens than in the Swan Pond, and usually takes a lot longer to be absorbed.

    I think the Board should get out of their chairs and take a walk - several, many walks - through the Village and especially the Swan Pond, and see how things are going there. Is there a more beautiful place anywhere else? Isn't the path that is there now better suited to the area than the paved "riverwalk" that was put in in front of the Hoffman Tower? What's wrong with the WPA steps? use them - both of them - all the time. And I donate and plant trees to help sustain the area's natural beauty.

    I once asked the Board to put a small rustic bench down along the river just below the Little Dam so that seniors like myself might have a place to rest, or anyone sit and enjoy the view, but President Wiaduck wrote me and told me "No." "No hardscape in the parks." Of course we got the Library reading circle (in concrete!) put in without even a permit right over the roots of nearby trees, , but that was an "official" project. I don't believe that this Board - perhaps any Board - has the right to mess around with the property along the river. To give them money from a TIF and include this "blighted" property in it is just plain asking for something bad to happen. Let's just keep these areas as they are.

    Posted Thursday Jan 4, 2007 10:45 #
  2. spatny
    Member

    It seems no one else is interested in the Swan Pond. Too bad.

    Posted Saturday Jan 6, 2007 17:05 #
  3. Catherine
    Member

    No spatny, I have discussed Swan Pond extensively - here and in email with the Village. They advised me there would be no public building erected in the park, one of my concerns. They did not confess to a paved walkway. I am very disappointed to hear that one because, of course, one has quite enough of walking on concrete and longs to walk on something soft. I thought if wood chips could be put on as on the berm behind the Scout Cabin (whatever that area is called) that would be excellent. That is my favorite place to walk, and you will not see more residents gathered in any one space than Swan Pond. The long set of steps are mysterious and beautiful. Perhaps they are worried about lawsuits from "invitees". This area was built for Riverside, not for tourists. I too shared your view that of course it is vacant, it is a park; and of course it floods, that's what it's there for! I think it is the most important and the most used green space in the town.

    I have noted a decline in the maintenance of the trees south of the tracks, have you?

    Don't get me started on that absurd concrete circle. By the way, why were the old flowering trees outside the library cut down? This was ruinous. For several months I would not go near the library because I could not stand to see them gone.

    Posted Saturday Jan 6, 2007 17:14 #
  4. spatny
    Member

    The Friends of the Library and the Olmsted Society paid for the new plantings, which I guess will be nice. I think they wanted a sprinkler system put in. The circle was supposed to be on a trial basis and made of fine gravel so it could be easily removed. They poured the concrete without a permit. I went to them and established that they had no permit BEFORE they poured it, but then that lunkhead at the Building Department did it anyway. Ms. Rush told me it would be removed if the Preservation commission wanted it out, which they did, but then the Lawyer said they couldn't take that action because it wasn't on the agenda. After that, I don't know what has taken place. That's why you can't trust these people.

    Chips on the path would be nice, but when the water floods they would wash away and out into the grass -they say. Then I tried to get fine gravel put down to cover some of the pieces of concrete and the muddy puddles that are there but they told me the same. And so it goes.

    Posted Saturday Jan 6, 2007 18:17 #
  5. MikeT
    Member

    Spatny (and anyone else) - One quick comment on this forum: no replies do not necessarily mean no interest. There are most certainly many people reading your entry. Maybe they had nothing material to add.

    This forum provides for new info, such as your fine input, to be ADDED into the public's consciousness, where there was a dearth of info. So sometimes, of necessity, this new info needs to be 'percolated'.

    I had the same question on some of the stuff I have written. Then I saw a poster a month later come up with a carefully thought out and crafted post expanding on something that I thought was 'dead'.

    miket

    Posted Monday Jan 8, 2007 11:48 #
  6. spatny
    Member

    The engineering report for the TIF District that Ms. Rush received in July includes: "Resurfacing of 2,000 feet of the existing gravel footpath (walkway.) Presumably this is from the driveway at Library Hill down to the end of the TIF district just above the Little Dam. Materials might include the type of perforated cement block that is used at the parkay of that rive and allows the grass to grow up through it, but might need some kind of concrete curbs to keep it on place.

    And: "An important upgrade to the Riverfront Area includes the extension of the (same) walkway east from the end of the existing footpath to the east side of the Swinging Bridge to connect to the existing sidewalk at Burling Road ..."to enhance the recreational use and aesthetics of the area to serve as a cornerstone of the redevelopment plan." This includes some significant structural support behind the library and town hall and includes riverbank work east of the Swinging Bridge, where the mysterious unidentified building and parking lot appear on the TOD map. Presumably taking this walk behind the service areas of the town hall will require the removal of the old Youth Center/Public Works bldg and make way for the ""Boutique Hotel.' When this happens, the whole scene will change. The WPA work now in place may be seventy years old, but it seems to fit in with giving the area an air of quiet and peacefulness. Any artificially contrived "riverwalk" that this Board OKs will be sure to have lot of kitschy little touches and "child safety" improvements - not to mention signage of all types. By the way, does anyone really think we should be putting up "No Smoking" signs in the parks?

    Posted Wednesday Jan 10, 2007 12:13 #
  7. corbi328
    Member

    Yes to the "No Smoking" signs. Smoking is a health hazard and if people want to slwly kill themselves they should do it in their own home.

    Posted Wednesday Jan 10, 2007 12:16 #
  8. ChrisHajer
    Member

    Speaking of smoking, has anyone noticed the no smoking signs on some businesses' doors? I think I saw one that said "no smoking within 50 feet" on the door of Pringles Flowers, I think. Is that due to the new non-smoking ordinance?

    Posted Wednesday Jan 10, 2007 13:02 #
  9. MikeT
    Member

    Is the engineering report that spatny is referring to on some website? Can someone provide a link?

    thanks

    miket

    Posted Wednesday Jan 10, 2007 13:22 #
  10. CandiGrace
    Member

    ChrisHajer-The new non-smoking ordinance went into affect on Jan 7. So we should be seeing signs on all public buildings. Enforcement is another matter...

    Posted Wednesday Jan 10, 2007 13:49 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.