Riverside Info » About Riverside

Revisiting Riverside

(14 posts)

Tags:

  1. Aberdeen
    Member

    Here's a link to a 2001 University of Michigan masters' thesis on Riverside: http://www.snre.umich.edu/ecomgt/pubs/riverside.htm

    Summary here:

    R e f l e c t i o n
    Why is Riverside significant today? As seen in the community comparisons, key elements of Riverside's design have been used as the formative structure of communities throughout the twentieth-century. Olmsted and Vaux's use of expansive, public open space is one element that has been repeated successfully over time. Advances in ecological restoration and preservation have made it possible to improve upon Olmsted's design principles while maintaining his and Vaux's design intent. Current efforts in Riverside, led by Riverside's forester, exhibit these advances and provide an encouraging future for the ecological health of Riverside.

    Riverside is also significant today because it still exhibits most of the qualities that Olmsted and Vaux envisioned in 1868. The curvilinear design of the road responding to topography and encouraging leisure, large trees and expansive green space accessible to the public, choreographed views and experiences as one moves through the landscape, and connections to the city of Chicago are all evident today.

    The survey we administered to residents of Riverside reveals the strong appreciation that the residents have for the beauty of the Riverside landscape and for the passive recreational opportunities that it provides. The survey posed questions that specifically addressed the resident's preferences for landscape features, which enabled us to begin to understand what areas or views of the landscape residents perceived as their favorite or least favorite. From the responses, we investigated how the spaces and views mentioned by the respondents related to Olmsted's design principles. In general, the spaces and views most preferred by residents strongly exhibit the design principles. Spaces and views that are least preferred by residents are incongruous with the overall design and feeling of Riverside. Although the results are not statistically significant due to the low response rate, the feedback we did receive from the residents emphasizes that the residents do appreciate the unique elements of Olmsted and Vaux's design of Riverside.

    The fact that Riverside has survived for over 130 years is significant for several reasons. Is it the high degree of community pride exhibited by most of its residents? Did Olmsted show foresight by designing roads that were able to accommodate changes in transportation? Or is it the vast amount of open space that exists throughout the community, promoting a healthier lifestyle?

    The answer is that Riverside's success relies on all of these things. Olmsted created a framework at Riverside that has adapted successfully to changing technologies and populations. This is his true accomplishment. If there is a lesson to be learned from Riverside and subsequent developments it should be that proper planning and consideration of the intended community, along with an informed vision, and multidisciplinary collaboration will help designers build upon previous successes and minimize failures.

    So, is Riverside a special place to live? Of course it is. And as along as Riverside continues to address the challenges and opportunities that modern society offers, it will continue to be a special place to live. Current initiatives, such as the National Park Service's work to document the cultural landscape of Riverside, will contribute to the strength of Riverside as a community and as a successful model for future community design. It is the hope of this master's project group that our contribution will provide a richer understanding and a broader historical context to all of Riverside's residents, its leaders, and the design community at large.

    Posted Monday Feb 12, 2007 22:11 #
  2. MikeT
    Member

    What a great piece for us to read and think about! Thanks. I find it very ironic when others outside of Riverside see the value of Riverside more than its leaders!!!

    A couple more factors that I would say has helped Riverside retain a semblance of its true self over the years despite 'alterations'....

    1) the cbd being not very accessible

    2) the Olmsted Society in general, and the designation of a Nat'l Historinc Landmark in particular; this actually is a variation on the master thesis' contention of community pride.

    3) a corollary of (1) is that there was a equilibrium between the cbd and this surrounding area with the net effect of no new commercial growth. The effect of no new growth is a retention of space and peace and tranquility and an exception to the helterskelter-ness of everywhere else.

    Curiously, right now, there is an attack on these factors.

    I have heard it suggested by some pro tif people that the Olmsted Society, and its passionate love of the Olmsted principles is passe and out of synch with the 21 st century. Maybe that is what the upcoming referendum is on.

    Of course, on the other factor, on the self limiting nature of the cbd, there is an attempt to 're-vitalize' it, read inject it with steroids, thus upsetting the equilibrium. This could be the ruination of Riverside.

    Will the REAL Riverside please stand up?

    Posted Monday Feb 12, 2007 22:30 #
  3. Lonnie
    Member

    The Concerned Citizens of Riverside have stood up, and we're fighting back. What really is out of sync is high density urbanism in the midst of Olmsted's village.

    Posted Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 08:53 #
  4. corbi328
    Member

    Thanks for posting this Aberdeen. I wonder if anyone in the Village knows about this study.

    I suggest that folks take some time to read the whole thesis before cherry picking sections. While I have not finished the whole thesis, I think this thesis highlights some of the very conflicting issues we are struggling with.

    Posted Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 09:11 #
  5. Tim
    Member

    It is interesting to see the breakdown of the component parts of Olmsted's plan...

    ...how small changes, the paving and build up of the streets, the subdivision of lots, the gradual invasion of oversized residential homes...slowly erode away a few of the key characteristics that define Olmsted's masterpiece. But the framework is still there, perhaps slightly patina'd...perhaps showing its age, but the framework is still there.

    The comparison of Olmsted's Riverside to a work of art, like a Picasso, is certainly one to consider...the opportunity to steward this vision, to preserve one of Landscape Architecture's early masterpieces is still within our reach...an opportunity which should not, can not be overlooked.

    I continue to have this horrible vision, though...of Steve Wynn, juggernaut Las Vegas developer, as he plunges his elbow through "Le Reve", one of Picasso's great masterpieces...and then,in an effort to correct the problem, he sticks his finger through the hole...only to tear the canvas even further.

    You cannot fix a masterpiece with a bandaid...in fact, some argue there is no need to fix the minor flaws and imperfections of an aged work of art, as these minor blemishes further define the masterpiece for what it is...a timeless work of art...

    ...Riverside.

    Posted Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 09:34 #
  6. spatny
    Member

    Corbi - check with the library for how many times I have had that checked out. Tell 'em you're from the EDC and they'll give you the info. It's nice that this process is exposing you to some of this. Now you just need to be able to understand it.

    What does this mean to you: "The survey we administered to residents of Riverside reveals the strong appreciation that the residents have for the beauty of the Riverside landscape and for the passive recreational opportunities that it provides." That we try and turn a natural flood plain into a soccer stadium, with amphitheater seating useful for "weddings, graduations and concerts?"

    Posted Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 12:09 #
  7. ChrisHajer
    Member

    Aberdeen, how did happen to come across this thesis? It's very interesting.

    While the students admit that the survey sample was not large enough to be considered representative of the village as a whole, I thought this was particularly interesting:

    The aspect most frequently mentioned by the residents for liking the Swan Pond area was that they could participate in passive recreation (which includes running, walking, reading, sledding, etc.).

    Posted Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 18:38 #
  8. Lonnie
    Member

    I met the students and was asked to take them on an abbreviated tour of the village when they were working on this. Their appreciation of the soothing effect of the landscape was palpable. Their thesis, of which I have only read parts of, reflects their keen understanding of how FLO's work has a subtle, yet definitive beneficial effect on Riverside's citizens.

    Posted Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 20:18 #
  9. spatny
    Member

    Of course. It's obvious - well to most - what is so great about the SP. Maybe they can't enunciate it, but I've taken scores of people there and they almost always are reluctant to leave. No one ever thought it was blighted. Some thought it was a small slice of heaven just nine miles from the Sears Tower. And when they saw a deer, a raccoon, a beaver in the water - they just couldn't believe it. It is our responsibility to see that this is not damaged.

    Posted Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 20:39 #
  10. Lonnie
    Member

    Just steps away from Town Hall and the train station, Swan Pond is an oasis of serenity containing some of the oldest trees in the village, trees that Olmsted saw when he came here in August of 1868. The first remark that I read about the amphitheatre here was something I thought was a tongue-in-cheek remark. Then I realized that it isn't.

    Posted Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 20:51 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.