Riverside Info » About Riverside

  1. spatny
    Member

    The weekend report...

    "CHARLOTTE, N.C (AP) -- Regulators on Friday shut banks in Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, and California, bringing the number of bank failures this year to 120 amid the struggling economy and a cascade of defaults on loans.

    Related Quotes
    Symbol Price Change
    EWBC 8.65 +0.26

    TBBK 5.16 0.00

    TRU 5.20 -0.31

    USB 23.73 -0.25

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. took over United Commercial Bank in San Francisco, with $11.2 billion in assets and $7.5 billion in deposits. East West Bancorp Inc., parent company of East West Bank based in Pasadena, Calif., is buying all of the deposits and most of the failed bank's assets.

    The FDIC also closed United Security Bank, based in Sparta, Ga., with $157 million in assets and $150 million in deposits; Home Federal Savings Bank in Detroit, with $14.9 million in assets and $12.8 million in deposits; Prosperan Bank, based in Oakdale, Minn., with $199.5 million in assets and $175.6 million in deposits; and Gateway Bank in St. Louis, with $27.7 million in assets and $27.9 million in deposits.

    Ameris Bank, based in Moultrie, Ga., agreed to assume the assets and deposits of United Security, while Liberty Bank and Trust Co., based in New Orleans, is buying the assets and deposits of Home Federal Savings.

    Alerus Financial of Grand Forks, N.D., agreed to assume the assets and deposits of Prosperan Bank, while Central Bank of Kansas City is buying the assets and deposits of Gateway Bank.

    The failure of United Commercial Bank is expected to cost the federal deposit insurance fund an estimated $1.4 billion; the failure of the other four banks a combined $132.7 million.

    With United Security, 21 Georgia banks have failed this year, more than in any other state. Most of the failures have involved banks in the Atlanta area, where the collapse of the real estate market brought economic dislocation. Failures also have been especially concentrated in California and Illinois.

    As the economy has soured, with unemployment rising, home prices tumbling and loan defaults soaring, bank failures have cascaded and sapped billions out of the federal deposit insurance fund. It has fallen into the red.

    Depositors' money -- insured up to $250,000 per account -- is not at risk, with the FDIC backed by the government. The FDIC still has billions in loss reserves apart from the insurance fund. It can also tap a Treasury Department credit line of up to $500 billion.

    Last week, regulators shut nine banks owned by holding company FBOP Corp. It was a new milestone: nine was the highest number of banks closed in a day since the financial crisis began taking down banks last year. Minneapolis-based US Bancorp bought the deposits and most of the assets of the banks, which included two others in California, three in Texas, two in Illinois and one in Arizona.

    Banks have been especially hurt by failed real estate loans. Banks that had lent to seemingly solid businesses are suffering losses as buildings sit vacant. As development projects collapse, builders are defaulting on their loans.

    If the economic recovery falters, defaults on the high-risk loans could spike. Many regional banks, especially, hold large concentrations of these loans. Nearly $500 billion in commercial real estate loans are expected to come due annually over the next few years.

    The 120 bank failures are the most in a year since 1992 at the height of the savings-and-loan crisis. They have cost the federal deposit insurance fund more than $27 billion so far this year, and hundreds more bank failures are expected to raise the cost to around $100 billion through 2013.

    The number of banks on the FDIC's confidential "problem list" jumped to 416 at the end of June from 305 in the first quarter. That's the most since June 1994. About 13 percent of banks on the list generally end up failing, according to the FDIC.

    The 120 failures this year compare with 25 last year and three in 2007.

    To replenish the insurance fund, the FDIC wants the roughly 8,100 insured banks and savings institutions to pay in advance about $45 billion in premiums that would have been due over the next three years.

    The Obama administration recently proposed a plan to provide infusions of money to small banks at low interest rates, provided they agree to increase lending to small businesses. Banks and credit unions that serve low-income areas would get aid at even lower rates to help small businesses in the hardest-hit rural and urban areas. The aid would come from money still available in the $700 billion federal bailout fund, which went mostly to large banks."

    Posted Sunday Nov 8, 2009 18:55 #
  2. spatny
    Member

    More...

    "NEW YORK (Reuters) - Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE - News; NYSE:FRE - News), the second largest provider of U.S. residential mortgage funding, on Friday posted a loss of $5 billion in the third quarter and predicted it would need more government support amid a "prolonged deterioration" in housing.

    Increases in the value of securities Freddie Mac held over the period helped buoy its net worth, however, erasing its need to tap government funds for a second straight quarter to stay solvent while continuing to buy and guarantee home loans.

    Including a $1.3 billion dividend payment on senior preferred stock bought by the Treasury in previous quarters, Freddie Mac's third-quarter loss increases to $6.3 billion.

    The home funding company's loss comes amid a rise in provisions for credit losses to $7.6 billion in the quarter, up 46 percent compared with the previous quarter, as delinquencies worsened on loans it guarantees. Provisions will remain high this quarter, it added.

    "I would say we are just beginning to see the impact of the chargeoffs on their guarantee book," said Janaki Rao, vice president of mortgage research at Morgan Stanley in New York.

    Its larger rival Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM - News; NYSE:FNM - News) on Thursday said it would need $15 billion from the U.S. Treasury after a whopping $18.9 billion third-quarter loss.

    Results at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are widely watched as a barometer of the U.S. housing market since they own or back nearly half of outstanding mortgages.

    The losses have presented a dilemma to Congress as it wants to protect taxpayers' money but is also counting on the companies to undertake foreclosure prevention efforts which are significantly adding to expenses.

    In order to ease the terms of loans under the Obama administration's Making Home Affordable refinancing program, the companies must buy the mortgages out of securities, and write down their value. Seeking alternatives to foreclosures also means bad loans sit on their books longer.

    Despite signs of recovery in home sales and prices, rising delinquencies and unemployment levels mean the housing market is still fragile, Freddie said. High unemployment, foreclosures and excess inventory will impede the recovery "for some time" and push house prices lower, the company said.

    This means that Freddie Mac's survival will continue to depend on support from the government, which forced the company and Fannie Mae into conservatorship in September 2008.

    Freddie Mac has taken $51.7 billion since then while Fannie Mae's draw will rise to $60.9 billion.

    For Freddie Mac, "the positive net worth without the help from the Treasury is significant, but it is too early to say whether an end to conservatorship is ahead," Rao said.

    Starting in 2010, the company will begin accounting for $1.8 trillion in mortgage-backed securities it guarantees on its balance sheet to meet new guidelines. This will increase interest income and interest expenses, and could have a significant negative impact on net worth, it said.

    Shares of Freddie Mac were flat at $1.23 in light after-hours trading following the results."

    Posted Sunday Nov 8, 2009 18:57 #
  3. spatny
    Member

    Tough Times?.

    "Talk about bad timing.

    As Washington reels from the news of 10.2 percent unemployment, the Center for Responsive Politics is out with a new report describing the wealth of members of Congress.

    Among the highlights: Two-hundred-and-thirty-seven members of Congress are millionaires. That’s 44 percent of the body – compared to about 1 percent of Americans overall.

    CRP says California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa is the richest lawmaker on Capitol Hill, with a net worth estimated at about $251 million. Next in line: Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), worth about $244.7 million; Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.), worth about $214.5 million; Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), worth about $209.7 million; and Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), worth about $208.8 million.

    All told, at least seven lawmakers have net worths greater than $100 million, according to the Center’s 2008 figures.

    “Many Americans probably have a sense that members of Congress aren’t hurting, even if their government salary alone is in the six figures, much more than most Americans make,” said CRP spokesman Dave Levinthal. “What we see through these figures is that many of them have riches well beyond that salary, supplemented with securities, stock holdings, property and other investments.”

    The CRP numbers are somewhat rough estimates – lawmakers are required to report their financial information in broad ranges of figures, so it’s impossible to pin down their dollars with precision. The CRP uses the mid-point in the ranges to build its estimates.

    Senators’ estimated median reportable worth sunk to about $1.79 million from $2.27 million in 2007. The House’s median income was significantly lower and also sank, bottoming out at $622,254 from $724,258 in 2007.

    But CRP’s analysis suggests that some lawmakers did well for themselves between 2007 and 2008, even as many Americans lost jobs and saw their savings and their home values plummet.

    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) gained about $9.2 million. Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) gained about $3 million, Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) had an estimated $2.6 million gain, and Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) gained about $2.8 million.

    Some lawmakers have profited from investments in companies that have received federal bailouts; dozens of lawmakers are invested in Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America.

    Among executive branch officials, CRP says the richest is Securities and Exchange Commission Chairwoman Mary L. Schapiro, with a net worth estimated at $26 million.

    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is next, worth an estimated $21 million. President Barack Obama is the sixth-wealthiest, worth about an estimated $4 million. Vice President Joe Biden has often tagged himself as an original blue collar man. The CRP backs him up, putting his net worth at just $27,000.

    He’s hardly the worst off.

    Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.), freshman Rep. Harry Teague (D-N.M.), Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.), Rep. John Salazar (D-Colo.) and Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.) each a net worth of less than zero, CRP says.

    One caveat on those numbers: Federal financial disclosure laws don’t require members to list the value of their personal residences. That information could alter the net worth picture for many lawmakers.

    Even so, Levinthal said, “It is clear that some members are struggling financially.

    “Over a calendar year, one’s wealth can change drastically. Many peoples’ investments took a nose dive over night in the last year,” he said.

    A number of lawmakers are estimated to have suffered double-digit percentage lossed in their net worth from 2007 to 2008. The biggest losers include Kerry, who lost a whopping $127.4 million; Warner lost about $28.1 million; Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) lost about $11.8 million; and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) lost about $10.1 million."

    Posted Sunday Nov 8, 2009 19:00 #
  4. anonymous
    Member

    My heart is heavy with sorrow that the lawmakers lost millions of dollars. And somehow, I don't believe that Biden is only worth $27K. He must not know how to manage his money very well--he makes $174,000 per year as a senator and as the veep, he makes $227K. How long has he been in the senate?

    Let's not forget the Lexus benefits the representatives have.

    Poor things, they will have to vote themselves another raise soon.

    Posted Sunday Nov 8, 2009 21:41 #
  5. spatny
    Member

    Free Market Flawed? Here's an interesting BBC article from today on how others see the future of capitalism...

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/8347409.stm

    Posted Sunday Nov 8, 2009 23:39 #
  6. spatny
    Member

    Is thar gold in them there hills?

    Here's an interesting quote from The National Inflation Association - whoever they are. They say Roubini does not understand inflation and deflation, and that gold will hit $2000 or more. In the interest of showing both sides of the debate, here, in part, is what they say:

    ""In our opinion, the world will be shocked at how quickly gold rises to
    $2,000. Jim Rogers' prediction of $2,000 per ounce of gold in the next decade
    is extremely conservative, it could happen next year. Jim Rogers based his
    prediction on the fact we have been discussing for a long time, gold's high of
    $850 in 1980 adjusted for inflation is $2,300 per ounce in today's dollars.
    Compared to 1980 when we were the world's largest creditor nation, today we
    are the world's largest debtor nation with a national debt that is about to
    hit $12 trillion. With the U.S. government itself estimating a $9 trillion
    budget deficit over the next decade, we will eventually get to a point where
    50% of taxes collected by the treasury will be needed to pay the interest on
    our national debt. Combined with unfunded liabilities for Social Security,
    Medicare and Medicaid, we believe hyperinflation is inevitable.

    "We agree with Roubini that U.S. stocks have run too far too fast and another
    dip in nominal terms is more likely to happen than not. What we know for sure
    is, U.S. stock markets are going to fall substantially priced in gold. History
    tells us that gold is the only real safe haven and after the collapse of a
    financial bubble, the Dow Jones/Gold ratio always falls to a level between 1
    and 2.

    "In 2008, the world rushed out of stocks and into U.S. dollars as a safe
    haven. We said U.S. dollars were the riskiest asset of all and that gold was
    the only real safe haven. Since then, the world has been rushing to get rid of
    their dollars by buying stocks, commodities and precious metals. With
    unemployment numbers being released on Friday, it is possible that investors
    will soon realize the U.S. economy is not truly recovering and stocks are
    rallying only due to inflation. This time around, as investors cash out of
    stocks, more people will stay clear of the U.S. dollar and rush to buy gold
    instead. We predict a major short-term decline in the Dow Jones/Gold ratio
    from its current level of 9, back down to the low of 7 we saw earlier this
    year. Over the next 12 months, the Dow Jones/Gold ratio is likely to make new
    lows for the current bear market."

    Posted Wednesday Nov 11, 2009 17:56 #
  7. CuriousResident
    Member

    Illinois ranks # 2 on the troubled state list

    Posted Wednesday Nov 11, 2009 18:42 #
  8. spatny
    Member

    California is now projecting that it will not see pre-recession levels of revenue until 2015! Five or six years!!! Nine states, including Illinois have similar situations according to the Pew report, out today.

    Posted Wednesday Nov 11, 2009 18:43 #
  9. PAR4
    Member

    And the bigger problem is all these states were running a deficit budget BEFORE the recession - so even a return to pre revenue levels doesn't mean much. These guys (us, unfortunately) will be floating debt with junk bond ratings - and if (when) inflation hits, it deeeep doo-doo time.....

    Posted Wednesday Nov 11, 2009 19:08 #
  10. anonymous
    Member

    All but Arizona are blue states.

    Posted Wednesday Nov 11, 2009 19:15 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.