Riverside Info » About Riverside

Special Board Meeting, 6/1/10--Parks and Rec

(57 posts)
  • Started 1 year ago by JohnM
  • Latest reply from simonscelerat
  1. JohnM
    Member

    Interesting Board meeting last night. A few thoughts:

    1) Our new village attorneys showed up woefully ill-prepared. They didn't even have a copy of the section of the Municipal Code that governs the Parks and Recreation Board.

    2) During their meetings to develop the plan to take over the Parks and Rec Board, President Gorman and Trustee Sacchi apparently failed to look at the legislative history of the Ordinance that established that Board. Even worse, neither did our attorneys. Had they done so, they might have discovered that the Village Board may not be permitted to dissolve the Parks and Rec Board, and that any decision regarding the future of that Board may need to be made by referendum--an idea that Trustee Sacchi had previously dismissed as either idiotic or ludicrous (I forget the language he used).

    3) Neither President Gorman nor Trustee Sacchi was able to articulate in any meaningful way how dissolving the Parks and Rec Board would save the village money or streamline procedures. They both insisted that dissolving the Parks and Rec Board would accomplish this, but could not give one concrete example that stood up to scrutiny.

    4) Trustee Sacchi rolls his eyes when residents speak.

    5) Out of an audience of at least 100 people, not one person stepped up to speak in favour of the proposal. Not one.

    6) Trustee Shevitz and President Gorman pass notes back and forth like a couple of schoolgirls. What would happen if they couldn't sit next to each other at meetings?

    7) Trustees Shevitz and Reynolds had almost nothing to say. Waiting to see which way the wind is blowing?

    The Board should end this fiasco as soon as possible. It was a stupid idea when the meeting started,and it became even more stupid as more facts were revealed. DOn't they have better things to do than mess with a Board and Department that has provided sterling service to our residents for over 70 years?

    Posted Wednesday Jun 2, 2010 08:57 #
  2. HRCollins
    Member

    Regarding point #2, Sacchi said it was the "Stupidest thing" he ever heard.

    Posted Wednesday Jun 2, 2010 09:15 #
  3. stephaniem
    Member

    I missed last nights meeting. By the time I arrived, an officer was standing at the door with the doors closed and it looked packed. on # 2 - Lanni doesn't want a referendum, but during the campaign didn't Shevitz say if things are good ideas people should vote on them? This must have been fun. When will it be on cable?

    Posted Wednesday Jun 2, 2010 09:31 #
  4. MeaghanM
    Member

    I have a question on the notes being passed back and forth between President Gorman and Trustee Shevitz. Since these notes are likely related to issues of public interest, are they viewable by citizens under the Freedom of Information Act? Can a resident file a FOIA request to get copies of these notes?

    Posted Wednesday Jun 2, 2010 10:04 #
  5. JillM
    Member

    Thanks for the summary John. Was this meeting taped?

    The last 'special meeting', the strategic planning session, was supposedly taped but has not been made available to the public online.

    Posted Wednesday Jun 2, 2010 13:40 #
  6. PaulML02
    Member

    I was at the meeting last night, Turns out that $53K savings the RCA insists on pushing will really cost over $200k in back funding. They really know how to save the taxpayer money don't they? Why is it everything they do costs the village more and more?

    Posted Wednesday Jun 2, 2010 16:03 #
  7. ChrisHajer
    Member

  8. Kelly
    Member

    It was revealed last night that the Recreation Department has its own levy. In 1937, the taxpayers were presented the following referendum:

    “Shall there be established, maintained and conducted a supervised recreation system within the Village of Riverside, for the conduct and maintenance of which system there shall be levied an annual tax of two-thirds of one mil in each dollar of assessed taxable property within the limits if said Village of Riverside?”

    The public voted yes. Since the levy was created by referendum, it can only be dissolved by referendum. Funds designated as a “Playground and Recreation Tax” are collected each year as part of your tax bill and amount to roughly $214,000 per year. No matter how you look at it, the Parks and Recreation Department is entitled to $214,000 or so each year. The Village Board can not change this levy without a popular vote in the form of a referendum.

    A huge crowd showed up in support of the Rec Department. Over 15 people got up to tell the board how important the Rec Depatment is to Riverside and how dissolving the board is NOT in Riverside's best interest.

    Faced with these facts, Gorman and Sacci, outright refused to withdraw their proposal to dissolve the Rec Board.

    I did appreciate that Lonnie vocalized at least part of his motivation. I can’t say the same for Shevitz and Gorman who work/plan/scheme to pull one over on the public at every turn.

    As for the meeting itself, Shevitz and Gorman need to be split up. They act like mischievous school children, whispering and hitting each other when points were made. And really, Mr. Gorman should not be allowed to cheat off of Shevitz’s paper. Are we not entitled to an open meeting IN an open meeting? Shevitz physically restrained Gorman from speaking last night. Gorman is the president; the public has the right to know his agenda. I hope someone follows through and file a FOIA request for Shevitz’s and Gorman’s notes.

    It was abominable that Gorman hung Peter out to dry last night. Peter said clearly that dissolving the Rec Department was not his idea, he has no opinion on the matter, he was simply tasked with researching and presenting Gorman’s plan. Peter held his own under an uncomfortable situation last night and we are very lucky to have him in Riverside

    So the big unresolved questions are:

    (1) Did Gorman, a lawyer, know that Parks and Rec had its own levy to the tune of $214,000? Was he just trying to pull a fast one? Did he adopt the attitude, “I can do anything I’m the president, who cares what the Ordinance, Statute or Municipal Code says?” Or… did he really not know. Did he not take time to pull the ordinance and read it? In my world, if a lawyer went into court this ill prepared, he or she would be fired. I expect the same should go for the Village President and Village legal counsel.

    (2) When will the Village transfer the funds over to the Recreation Department as mandated by law? How will this affect the ever growing deficit and how will the Board address the structural deficit?

    (3) Knowing that the plan to dissolve the Rec Department has no articulable benefits, no public support, no cost savings, and is illegal but for a referendum, why would Gorman waste our precious taxpayer dollars to have the staff and Village attorney search for a loophole to dissolve the Department?

    Which leads to the last question, what is Gorman/Sacchi’s real motivation here?

    Posted Wednesday Jun 2, 2010 17:09 #
  9. dismayed
    Member

    The meeting was shocking! It is a must watch for anyone living in this Village. You may not have liked previous administrations but Gorman, Shevitz and Sacchi are truly shifty. Approximately, 1,095 days to the next election!!! Let this be a lesson of the dire consequences of not voting ! Hopefully, we will have something left to fight for because if we blink they may sell the Water tower!

    Meaghan please let us know what comes of your FOIA! Should be entertaining!

    Posted Wednesday Jun 2, 2010 17:54 #
  10. Jerry Buttimer
    Member

    Emerson said "Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom."

    Last night's meeting pointed out some serious problems none of which are in the recreation department.

    Posted Wednesday Jun 2, 2010 18:16 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.