Riverside Info » About Riverside

Special Meeting Friday 8am: Buying the house in between on Burlington

(12 posts)
  1. Catherine
    Member

    SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
    Village of Riverside

    27 Riverside Road

    Riverside, IL 60546

    Friday, November 23, 2007

    8:00 a.m. Room 4

    1. Call to Order

    2. Roll Call

    President

    Harold J. Wiaduck

    Village Trustees

    Candice Grace John Scully
    Ben Sells Thomas Shields

    Kevin Smith Jean Sussman

    3. Discussion of the purchase of 61 E. Burlington

    4. Executive Session -- Acquisition of Real Estate

    5. Adjournment

    POSTED: November 20, 2007 Bulletin Board Website

    FAXED: Suburban Life The Landmark Mike Aieta, Karina Turner
    708-447-9871 708-524-0447 Riverside Cable Commission

    Posted Tuesday Nov 20, 2007 15:15 #
  2. spatny
    Member

    The day after Thanksgiving for a Special Meeting. Now I see they cancelled it. Probably KRush is going to the sales. These people are preposterous.

    Posted Tuesday Nov 20, 2007 16:08 #
  3. spatny
    Member

    It may become a parking lot, but I think they will come up with some PUD to "cap" that end of the CBD. They all want to be "players".

    Posted Tuesday Nov 20, 2007 22:46 #
  4. KimJ
    Member

    http://www.rblandmark.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&ArticleID=3195&TM=75652.54

    Riverside buys second home in downtown area
    Land could be used for parking or other development

    By BOB UPHUES

    The Village of Riverside acquired a second parcel of property immediately adjacent to the downtown business district last week when the board voted to purchase 61 E. Burlington St. for $325,000. The vote was taken at a special meeting of the board convened on the morning of Nov. 13.

    The purchase comes on the heels of a decision by the board in August to buy a single-family home at 63 E. Burlington St. for $230,000, giving the village a piece of land covering 10,000-square feet that it can develop or sell at a future time.

    While there has been some talk at the village board table that the land could be converted into a surface parking lot, the village is under no obligation to do that, according to Village Manager Kathleen Rush. What the purchase does do is give the village control over what is eventually built there, whether it's a parking lot, a public facility or even a private development.

    If the land is used to create a parking lot, the two parcels together could accommodate 40 vehicles, according to the village's engineering firm.

    Rush indicated that while the land won't need to be rezoned to build a parking lot at the site, the village's Plan Commission will likely discuss what might be appropriate for the land moving forward, including rezoning. Both lots are currently zoned R-4, which allows single- and multi-family dwellings and small-scale office uses. The rest of East Burlington Street directly west of 61 E. Burlington St. is zoned B-2, the central business district.

    "By procuring this opportunity, it allows the village to be determinate in its outcome," Rush said. "I think it's a great opportunity for the Plan Commission to discuss what the highest and best use for that land is."

    Trustee Thomas Shields, who has been a strong supporter of spurring development in the central business district, hailed the land purchase and the ability the village has to control its destiny.

    "This property was available, we had willing sellers and we now have the opportunity to participate more directly in the central business district as a land owner," said Shields in a statement released by the village last week.

    The village has already purchased 63 E. Burlington St., using a loan from the working cash fund, which will be paid back over a period of 10 years through the general fund, according to Rush.

    In addition, on Nov. 13 the board passed a resolution allowing the village to borrow up to $850,000 for the future development of those two lots. Rush said it was unlikely the village would borrow the full amount.

    "It doesn't obligate the village to borrow, it provides the opportunity to borrow," Rush said.

    The board has not made a decision on how to fund the purchase of 61 E. Burlington St., but will discuss options at its meeting on Dec. 3.

    Posted Wednesday Nov 21, 2007 20:03 #
  5. spatny
    Member

    Look for a PUD.

    Posted Wednesday Nov 21, 2007 22:36 #
  6. Catherine
    Member

    The trustees already said the land would be rezoned and razed for business parking. So, now not.

    I guess all that cr*p about the government being broke was just more Chicken Little.

    Well, I hope they got a fair market price and didn't have the muscle put on them.

    Posted Thursday Nov 22, 2007 00:28 #
  7. spatny
    Member

    I go to those meetings and haven't heard that - only called it "an option." I think it could become an "anchor" for the East end of the CBD. Maybe something "Over" the parking.

    Posted Thursday Nov 22, 2007 09:44 #
  8. Catherine
    Member

    Yes, at the meeting when I asked about the PUD, after the meeting Nick pointed out it was a residential area, they said they were paving it over and rezoning it for business parking. This was the 63 property.

    Judging from the tags, I take it someone is implying that $350 was not fair market price.

    Posted Friday Nov 23, 2007 10:32 #
  9. law2boyz
    Member

    What is the most shocking is that $350k is 1/2 of what it would have cost to repair the underground pedestrian tunnel. Children are constantly crossing the tracks, as are commuters. What is the cost for safety and a connected Village?

    Posted Tuesday Dec 4, 2007 13:58 #
  10. EricSundstrom
    Member

    I went back and checked into what the costs of rehabbing the tunnel would be. Since a refurbishing of the tunnel would have to comply with the Americans w/ Disabilities Act the cost was put at 1.5 million for starters which means more in the long run. Also it would require messing with the existing train station. The only less expesive way would be to put a new tunnel to the west of the train station, which to my mind would severely negate its usage.

    Posted Tuesday Dec 4, 2007 14:35 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.