Those of you who are here and who don't have plans, that is:
Post of 12/29
"Residents:
The elected officials and staff and the advisory commissions of the Village of Riverside have been and will continue to be responsive to the needs and desires of the community. As stated in a press release, on the web site and restated in another thread,
“At their meeting on Monday, December 4, 2006, the Village Board of Trustees deferred the matter of AN ORDINANCE PROPOSING APPROVAL OF A REDEVLEOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT FOR AND THE DESIGNATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ADOPTION OF TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION FINANCING THEREFOR, CONVENING A JOINT REVIEW BOARD AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
The Board will take up the matter again at 7:30 p.m., January 8 at the Committee of the Whole (please note that public comment is generally not permitted at the COW). The Board expressed a great deal of interest in providing more background on the issues confronting the Village and hearing more from residents on their solutions and suggestions for confronting those issues. The Board will discuss on January 8 alternative processes to achieve this dialogue (who, how, when, where). They will likely consider a timeframe for these discussions as well. The Board members expressed a desire to have the Plan Commission and Economic Development Commission involved in the discussions.—
All of the zoning and planning efforts conducted by the Village Board incorporate and venerate preservation and the need to preserve and rehabilitate Riverside's assets. The actions of the Village Board to date have been transparent, occurred over a considerable period of time, open to the public, available for discussion and subject to scrutiny. There are no intentions whatsoever to make wholesale changes in Riverside.
The Board recognizes the concerns being voiced. There is recognition, that unlike most TIF plans, the Riverside Redevelopment Plan does not respond to any one developer's requests nor does it result from a Request for Proposal to redevelop a specific area. The Redevelopment Plan is proactive. It considers the opportunities that might occur where the Village can actually partner and improve the development or redevelopment that results from market conditions.
The Board invites residents to openly share their ideas for how the next phase of these discussions should occur. What alternative solutions are available to the address the questions posed to the elected officials:
What opportunities or solutions might be appropriate for economic development support in the Central Business District or on the community's periphery? How should the community evaluate those solutions? What role should the Village take in fostering investment in private property? How should the Village finance the public improvements in the Central Business District that will support the viability and the potential of the business community? How should those actions be funded in light of the Village's strained financial condition? What tools or catalysts are available to the Village to encourage investment in the existing properties? What type, if any, additional planning studies and efforts will be helpful to formulate a response to the condition?
Any suggestions received for the next phase of this process and dialogue will be included in my communication to the Village Board. In order to have a full and deliberate discussion of these suggestions, I encourage residents to provide them to me in writing by January 4 so that they can be included in the official agenda packet. I am sure the Board will include many opportunities for additional discussion on the above questions.
Additionally, it is important to keep in mind that KMA was hired to determine if the area would meet the eligibility requirements under the TIF statute. They did that. They were charged with developing a redevelopment plan for the area based upon the TOD and the zoning district limitations. They did that. I encourage you to look at East Dundee, St. Charles, Bartlett or any other community's redevelopment plan (many are done by different consultants than KMA). They follow the same model as they must to meet the state statutes (see www.illinois-tif.com/IllinoisTIFs.htm). They are written to provide flexibility so that the elected officials who are charged with the fiduciary responsibility of setting policy for the local government can make judgment on proposals, evaluating them against the plans that are in place and the legislative boundaries established by ordinance. You may also note as you visit other community websites that many of them have TIF guidelines in place. Similar guidelines would be a part of any effort in Riverside and have been suggested by KMA.
Postscript on the Berwyn planning effort —“ they are receiving funding for a transit oriented development study from METRA similar to what occurred in Riverside. The City of Berwyn officials reached out to us in their initial application and there was mutual expression of interest in the effort to improve the viability of this area (the boundaries are yet to be officially determined).
Posted: 2006-12-29 17:23:49 #