Riverside Info » About Riverside

Suburban Life - Post Election Issue

(3 posts)
  • Started 5 years ago by MikeTomecek
  • Latest reply from Elisa
  1. MikeT
    Member

    I want to point out a conversation I had with my wife today. She read the following paragraph from this article and said this was a significant point against the TIF. I assumed it was an opinion piece like a Letter to the Editor. When I read it, however, I discovered that it was a descriptive piece of the TIF, and not opinion.

    I responded to me wife, 'that is just what a TIF is'. She said that is not how the Village described it in their mailing.

    Establishing a TIF district allows a municipality to fund major redevelopment projects by using increases in tax revenue generated by the redevelopment. The increases in tax revenue are collected by only the village for the life of the TIF district, which is typically 23 years. This means other taxing bodies, including local school districts and the county, don't benefit from the increases until it expires.

    http://www.chicagosuburbannews.com/riverside/homepage/x1094479027

    Riverside voters stiff TIF district proposal
    By Dan Petrella
    Riverside Suburban Life
    Thu Apr 19, 2007, 05:04 PM CDT
    Story Tools: Email This Email This | Print This Print This
    Riverside, IL -

    More Riverside residents voted to oppose the creation of a tax increment financing district in a referendum Tuesday than voted for any of the elected officials serving in the village government.

    With all precincts reporting, 1,760 voters opposed the financial strategy, while 444 voted in favor, according to unofficial results reported by the Cook County clerk's office.

    Trustee Cindy Gustafson received 1,274 votes in the 2003 election, the most of any official serving on the board prior to Tuesday's election.

    In this year's uncontested race for three open trustee seats, John Scully was re-elected with 1,644 votes. Jean Sussman was elected to her first term with 1,659 votes and Ben Sells was elected for the first time with 1,607 votes.

    “It's very clear what the residents of Riverside want,— said Mark Shevitz, a resident who has been critical of the TIF proposal since it was first presented to the public last fall.

    “The board has a very clear choice before them: They can side with the residents or they can side with the developers.—

    Shevitz attended a “No TIF— party on election night with about 20 other “jubilant— residents on the 100 block of Scottswood Road.

    The board has said the plan might be necessary to fund street and sewer repairs and a number of other projects to rejuvenate the downtown, where property values lag behind the rest of the village. But opponents have argued it could hurt schools and would serve as a subsidy for developers.

    Establishing a TIF district allows a municipality to fund major redevelopment projects by using increases in tax revenue generated by the redevelopment. The increases in tax revenue are collected by only the village for the life of the TIF district, which is typically 23 years. This means other taxing bodies, including local school districts and the county, don't benefit from the increases until it expires.

    Before a TIF district can be approved by the village, a joint review board made up of representatives from all the taxing bodies that would be affected must be convened, and a public hearing must be held. Riverside has not yet reached this point in the process because an official vote on the proposal was delayed to gather more input from residents.

    Village President Harold Wiaduck said the referendum vote is not binding and was placed on the ballot by opponents of the TIF before the village held a series of eight community workshops to gather input from residents on the proposal.

    “Certainly (the outcome of the vote) will be looked at, but whether it will be the linchpin of the decision, I don't know if that will be the case,— Wiaduck said.

    He said the village is reaching a point where its budget reserves are running low and operating costs are increasing faster than tax revenue, and the TIF district is one possible solution to address the problem.

    “Unfortunately the TIF has been cast by opponents in terms of it only helping developers,— Wiaduck said.

    The board will continue discussion of the proposal at its meeting Monday, and could vote to adopt the redevelopment plan as soon as Monday, May 7. Once the plan is adopted, a joint review board meeting and a public hearing must be held before the TIF district can be created.

    Posted Saturday Apr 21, 2007 17:10 #
  2. spatny
    Member

    We had eight workshops and the vote of those attendeing was 3-1 against the TIF. Many of the items that the Board will debate on Monday night were presented in the TOD study and roundly rejecetd by an even higher percentage of the workshop attendees. The results of those workshops were colated and known within a few days, but these two BOar-only workshops - where no public input is involved - are working from a matrix prepared by or under the direction of the Village Manager. It was the Village manager who guided the flawed B2 zoning process, brought in the partial grant that funded the Metra/RTA sponsored TOD study that was then used as the basis for the workshops, and it is the Village Manager that sold the concept of the same consultants that did the TOD to come in and do a TIF study - something that started out costing $30-35,000 and will surely go over $100,000 - perhaps way over - if it is pursued.

    Nowhere, at any time, has there been strong public support for this TIF poposal. AS the ill-begotten VC rises even what there was has shrunk. Yet despite the fact the the concept of a TIF was roundly rejected at the workshops, and overwhekmingly refuted at the polls by a large percentage of the residents, certain Village officials still want to pursue it. Just as with the granting of the variances to the VC, one has to ask why. I ask plainly, who will benefit from this TIF? I have proposed that the Village define it's infrastructure repair and renewal needs and include a modest amount of money for a cosmetic lift for the CBD, and ask the voters for it. If they believe it is right for Riverside, they will vote for it. People are tired of hearing Trustee Shields and President Wiaduck and the Village Manager (who thankfully doesn't vote on it or at all in Riverside because she doesn't live here or pay taxes here) deride and discount the results of this election. It was not flawed and it was not stolen. If the Board respects the residents it will vote to drop this nemesis at its earliest opportunity, and immediately stop paying more of the taxpayers' dollars to the consultants who fobbed it off on them.

    Posted Saturday Apr 21, 2007 19:05 #
  3. Elisa
    Member

    "Village President Harold Wiaduck said the referendum vote is not binding and was placed on the ballot by opponents of the TIF before the village held a series of eight community workshops to gather input from residents on the proposal."

    This statement is nonsense - it is not relevant that the question was put on the ballot before the 8 community workshops nor is it relevant that the ballot question was put on by opponents of the TIF. What is relevant is that even after the community workshops, even after the Village's pre-election mailing, even after the village made an attempt to educate the residents and learn all there was to about the TIF, even after the village's own people - members of the EDC, even Phil McKenna himself - even after all of that the voters still decided that a TIF is not what is best for the village.

    Posted Saturday Apr 21, 2007 21:31 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.