Riverside Info » About Riverside

Tell congress NO to shutting down the parts of the internet

(6 posts)
  • Started 5 months ago by roderick
  • Latest reply from ChrisHajer
  1. roderick
    Member

    This smells like stuff China does. Please sign the petition and let congress know where everyday Americans stand on the unilateral removal of internet websites because of allegations of copyright infringement. It would be like shutting down the Stevenson expressway because some people were speeding - and get this - all there would need to be would allegations of speeding to shut it down.

    As soon as this week, Congress will start debating whether to give the government the power to turn off parts of the Internet. If that sounds like a terrible recipe for abuse of power, that's because it is.

    If enacted, a new law would make it so a simple allegation of copyright infringement—with no review process—could lead to the shutdown of sites from YouTube to Wikipedia to MoveOn.org.1 Any website, foreign or U.S.-based, could be wiped out on suspicion and made unavailable to everyone in the world.

    For example, if you (or Justin Bieber) wanted to post a video to YouTube of yourself singing a Beatles song, a record company could force the Department of Justice to shut down YouTube. Really.2

    But as you may have guessed, Congress didn't come up with this tragically terrible idea on their own. Lobbyists representing Comcast, Pfizer, record and movie companies, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce3 have been pushing Democrats and Republicans to pass bills to allow this new kind of Internet censorship. And they're close to getting their way.

    But a small number of Democrats are standing strong and saying "No" to these powerful special interest groups. They need our help.

    Senator Ron Wyden from Oregon is one of our champions. He has promised to start a historic filibuster of the Internet Censorship Act where he'll read the names of every person that signs a petition against Internet censorship.4 It's the perfect opportunity for 5 million Internet-connected progressives to visibly add their voice to a Senate debate. The more of us that sign, the stronger this effort to block this terrible law will be.

    Click here to add your name and say NO to Internet Censorship.
    We know that the Internet's openness, freedom, and lack of censorship are what make it a bastion of infinite possibility, continued innovation, and job creation. Innovative companies like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Mozilla, and Yahoo have spoken out against this law, saying:

    We should not jeopardize a foundational structure that has worked for content owners and Internet companies alike and provides certainty to innovators with new ideas for how people create, find, discuss, and share information lawfully online.5
    Internet venture capitalists say that the legislation is "ripe for abuse,"6 and leading law professors reject it because it will "allow the government to block Internet access to websites."7

    We condemn censorship overseas when it happens in China or Iran. But today, we need to stand up for freedom of speech on the Internet here at home.

    Click here to add your name and say NO to Internet Censorship.

    Posted Tuesday Nov 29, 2011 12:54 #
  2. roderick
    Member

    looks like congress might actually be voting on this (vs merely debating)....please call our senators and tell them to keep the internet free from censorship.

    pls call Senators Dick Durbin and Mark Kirk and tell them:

    "Say NO to Internet censorship. Vote NO on the Protect IP Act."

    orwellian - "protect IP" (intellectual property) and really they are removing freedom of expression - the very engine of intellectual property creation - without due process.

    Senator Dick Durbin
    Phone: 202-224-2152

    Senator Mark Kirk
    Phone: 202-224-2854

    Posted Tuesday Nov 29, 2011 18:36 #
  3. spatny
    Member

    This is the big guys that own the content practicing overkill, as they usually do. I support Wyden's effort 110%. The internet is important - especially because it allows everyone to participate. Ideas need to be kicked around, shared, sometimes abused. It's more interesting to talk and argue with people you don't agree with - even if you think they are as dumb as a dining room table (Barney Frank's euphemism) and sometimes the tires run off the road and kick up a little dust and gravel. That's what is great about the internet. WE shouldn't have to have a room full of lawyers to quote what somone else said or show something to someone. But the big money wants this and we need to fight it. This is the Lawyers Full Employment Act incarnate, just like the Dam Removal Project is full employment for engineers and experts who will be long gone when their work is done. Or half done.

    Posted Tuesday Nov 29, 2011 20:31 #
  4. mrt
    Member

    I only just heard about this . would this law - the senate version, if approved - mean that this website, for example, would be shut down if there were links to copyrighted material? or would the residence of the material, say, youtube, be shut down?

    How would the copyright infringment claim be adjudicated or vetted?

    The internet as it is now is so big - how would this law be supported and enforced ($)? Can this cause more confusion than good?

    Generally, one has to be pretty circumspect in limiting free expression, it seems. It is de rigeur in china to limit websites (access?), but does nt feel right over here.

    here are some links...

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20093304-38/five-essential-changes-to-protect-ip-act/

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrydownes/2011/11/28/the-revolt-against-congresss-new-internet-piracy-proposals/?feed=rss_home

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/sopa-opposition-goes-viral/2011/11/22/gIQAZX7OmN_story.html

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-gagnier/sopa-and-protect-ip-what-_b_1099471.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protect_IP_Act

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act

    Posted Tuesday Nov 29, 2011 23:11 #
  5. ChrisHajer
    Member

    "The PROTECT IP Act Is Very Real and Very Bad — Call Now to Block It"

    The PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) is the evil step-sister of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), the much-criticized Internet blacklist bill introduced in the House last month. They’ve got a lot in common — both bills would allow the government and private rightsholders to censor the Internet for Americans, and both bills have faced strong opposition from regular citizens, business leaders, and public interest groups.

    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/protect-ip-act-very-real-very-bad-call-now-block-it

    Posted Wednesday Nov 30, 2011 17:02 #
  6. ChrisHajer
    Member

    Google rips Senate's online piracy bill:
    'This is what is wrong with Washington'

    The memo that is being circulated on Capitol Hill lists five reasons not to co-sponsor the legislation. It argues the bill puts at risk “the ability for free speech and the ability of political parties to spread their message” while creating a “thicket of new Internet regulations similar to the administration’s net-neutrality rules.”

    It also calls the legislation “a trial lawyer’s dream” and claims it seeks to “regulate the Internet.”

    Source:
    http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/196385-google-piracy-bill-a-trial-lawyers-dream

    Posted Thursday Dec 1, 2011 15:09 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.