Riverside Info » About Riverside

What Would You Do with $50,000 ?

(14 posts)
  • Started 4 years ago by MikeTomecek
  • Latest reply from Catherine
  1. MikeT
    Member

    Mr Scully yesterday correctly apprised the cost to go forward as at least $50,000 (could be more, up to a $100,000). We cannot go back in time to say how we should have spent whatever we spent on the TIF, but we can do this thinking now. Like Sharon Lehman from OP said, we are in a very position since we have not adopted the TIF yet, unlike OP, which is entangled in it.

    Anyone have some other ideas on what to do with that money? It has to improve Riverside, especially the CBD - and you can't give Kafka $20,000 to pay his water bill.

    my first impression - not necessarily the most prudent - is

    *to buy some trees in the trainscape on north and south sides of the tracks. I don't know what that would cost. 2 trees per property and ?250? properties = 500 trees @ $100 each = $50,000. I am a tree guy. On this one, I'd probably not spend a standing $50k, but would rrather get it from a 'grass roots' campaign asking people to pitch in. 'sponsor a tree to welcome the people who pass by our town each day...'.

    do we really know what it would cost to fix the infrastructure with the load bearing it has now vs high density?

    *The $50,000 can also go towards fixing water pipes; it'll be less of a bond issuance.

    *Hold it, earn interest on it, and plan out what we should do, and see how the VC and the other developments work.

    .
    *spend some money on Public Relations - increase web presence, well placed brochures. This is probably a fraction of the $50k.

    Today coming into work as I walked by the Sears Tower on Jackson downtown, I saw a bunch of tourists with their cameras. They looked like just types who, if directed, could take a quick 20 minute train ride from Union Station only a short block from the Sears Tower, to Riverside and have a walking tour. Some guy or gal or both will have a Bike place so that they can rent out BIkes in the center of town, and they can tour our lovely town this way. The can possibly make a biking day of it and connect with the Bemis path.

    Or they can take the trolley to Brookfield zoo.

    *EDIT - I see Kim's idea. get that guard over there. one quick question on the guard: wd at least some of the cost for school crossing guard come from the d96 budget? But one can now quickly see how taking away money from one taxing body, the schools, removes that money the body had. Little kids cannot wait 23 years for the crossing guard. Good idea, Kim.

    Posted Tuesday May 8, 2007 16:58 #
  2. KimJ
    Member

    Ames School is in DESPERATE need of a crossing guard. Ms. Rush told the Ames PTA yesterday that the Village has no money. What if instead of paying another $50,000 to Phil, we hire a crossing guard for $10,000 that will keep our kids safe on their way to school? Me Likey.

    Posted Tuesday May 8, 2007 17:11 #
  3. TJS
    Member

    Let's see, for $50,000 the village could purchase about two new police cars. $50,000 would also be a good start to adding another policeman to the force. What could the Fire Department do with $50,000? I'me sure they could use it. The recreation department could wisely spend the money. Of course we'll never know what that $50,000 will get us as it is flushed down the toilet with the other TIF costs.

    Posted Tuesday May 8, 2007 17:15 #
  4. Catherine
    Member

    Trees. Something has to be done about keeping a rolling replanting of the Olmsted design going. Olmsted's design is the national historic monument that is this village. That design is not about green grass, but about trees.

    When I was a kid, parents and older children were the crossing guards. Maybe when people are convinced their tax money is being spent wisely and parsimoniously, it will bring forth more volunteer efforts.

    It is not hard for me to believe people would not approve a funding referendum for repairing the sewage infrastructure. Sewage is kind of a key item for most people.

    Posted Tuesday May 8, 2007 23:14 #
  5. spatny
    Member

    If you look at the money spent on the B2 zoning (that doesn't work), the TOD (our contribution and ancillary costs) and this TIF you are above $300K - and with that you could accomplish quite a bit. But of course they spend money on legal and consultants and the like as though we had unlimited resources. What do you think it costs every time they do a Resolution?

    Posted Tuesday May 8, 2007 23:47 #
  6. EricSundstrom
    Member

    Landscape the B2 district with flowering perennials. By the way Spatny, In what manner does the B2 zoning not work. I purchased a copy at the library years ago. Its is an extremely more comprhensive plan than the previous ordinace which was originally drawn up in 1927.

    Posted Wednesday May 9, 2007 15:18 #
  7. spatny
    Member

    Eric - it allowed that monster to be built with no design review criteria, for one.

    Posted Wednesday May 9, 2007 16:41 #
  8. spatny
    Member

    $50,000. ? At $200 each that would be 250 trees. I'd put in World Savings and get about 6% on it and over the next six-seven years you could put in an extra 50 trees a year. Give the money to our Forester, Mike Collins, and let him and the rightful chairman of the Landscape Advisory Commission figure out where to put them. That would be the best thing we could do for "The Village in the Forest - bring in more species diversity and let people who know what they are doing and understand Olmsted do it.

    Today, when people shop for homes - mature trees command higher prices - sometimes as much as $25,000 each - when lots or homes are being bought and sold. There is nothing you can do for Riverside that will pay a greater dividend. If anybody wants to make a tax-deductible contribution they can do it to the RBHS Tree Bank which is trying to do just this very thing - plant more diverse native trees all over the village.

    Posted Wednesday May 9, 2007 17:21 #
  9. CuriousResident
    Member

    Just curious, what is on the "more diverse" list? Is it the list on the fairly recent LAC publiucation (Landscaping in a Landmark Village)?

    I ask because the plant-a-tree program has dramatically reduced the offerings list over the past few years...

    Posted Thursday May 10, 2007 08:43 #
  10. Catherine
    Member

    The Forestry Department at the Village website has a list of Riverside-approved trees. These are species that are native to Northern Illinois. It also has a list of banned species.

    I think the original Olmsted plan of what species belongs where should be followed. Olmsted is to be likened to a painter, who made these choices deliberately and carefully. His choices should not be replaced with willy-nilly species and placement. Again, it is his design that is the National Landmark. As to Dutch elm, there are new disease resistant varieties that are successfully being planted elsewhere, don't know about here.

    Posted Thursday May 10, 2007 09:19 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.